Perhaps a bad analogy. Basically what I am tring to say is while it may hurt the company briefly by having the server removed. Its the companies fault for letting him use his own server for company use.
I agree that he is in his right to rip out the server. However this is a small community and it doesn't do any good to make more enemies then necessary. I feel that it would have been better to work it out with the company to have it replaced ASAP. Get it in writing and if they don't hold up their end. Have the tables turned by getting the HPD to help him remove equipment rightfully his. I hope the company comes to their senses and stops all the stupidity. Which reminds me of Hanlons Razor. "Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity." yuser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>@videl.ics.hawaii.edu on 05/19/2003 05:07:35 PM Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject: Re: [luau] Law stuff advice On 17 May 2003 at 18:09, Michael_Bishop/FARRINCS/[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > It would be like a programmer taking the > part of the program that they coded when they leave the company. Not the same thing. If your job is programming you are being paid to create programs for the company. Using your own physical equipment is different. I can take my pencil to work and it is still mine at the end of the day, the documents the company pays me to create with that pencil are thiers. This company was obviously very short- sighted by not seeing the need to order their own pencils. _______________________________________________ LUAU mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://videl.ics.hawaii.edu/mailman/listinfo/luau
