On Feb 17, 2008, at 1:36 PM, Kristian Erik Hermansen wrote:
On Feb 17, 2008 2:25 PM, Jim Thompson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
infringement, pure and simple), and then politicizes their 'security
features' as better, no matter what they've broken. Any real
security work by OpenBSD is quickly copied into FreeBSD and NetBSD,
You have to admit that OpenBSD has the safest networking stack.
No, I don't. Especially since it doesn't.
OpenBSD is also the first to implement any bleeding-edge security
threats.
I'm sure. (You may wish to re-parse your words here.)
Take a look at the history.
Yes, I have looked at the history of the OpenBSD stack and software
issues.
That was my point. You seem to have missed it in your fandom for
Theo's "groupthink".
Sometimes "breakage" happens because the other developers who built
code on top of an
infrastructure assumed too much...
While this is a true statement, a properly-constructed system
('infrastructure') shouldn't be open to this type of failure.
_______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
http://lists.hosef.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/luau
