I vote for #2 too, this is one of the features we can have on a Linux distributions that micro$oft could not: a complete workstation in a few clicks.
On Thu, May 21, 2009 at 1:51 PM, AdamBOT <[email protected]> wrote: > I also agree that we should go for #2, mainly because when i get a > distro, i want it to just work, i don't want to have to install basic > things like a full featured web browser (firefox) or office suite > (openoffice) > > Adam > > On Thu, May 21, 2009 at 9:29 AM, Luther Goh Lu Feng <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> ----- Original Message ---- >>> From: Mario Behling <[email protected]> >>> To: [email protected] >>> Sent: Tuesday, May 19, 2009 2:20:12 PM >>> Subject: [Lubuntu-desktop] lubuntu - minimal install or full featured >>> lightweight distro >>> >>> >>> The question of lubuntu is: >>> 1. Either we want to make it a minimal install or >>> 2. we want to make it a lightweight alternative to full featured distros. >>> I vouch for the second. >>> >> >> I vote for #2. I always feel that it is a waste if the full 700MB of a cd is >> not even 50% used. >> >> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-desktop >> Post to : [email protected] >> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-desktop >> More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp >> > > > > -- >><)))*> Embrace Eternity <*(((>< > > _______________________________________________ > Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-desktop > Post to : [email protected] > Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-desktop > More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp > _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-desktop Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-desktop More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
