Ok. I have data from THIS year. I've made right now, and I must say that this is a good practice when you design a new theme, the thing is I didn't believe that I must demostrate this results, but there's no problem. Please, check this: http://dl.dropbox.com/u/133108/gtkperf/gtkperf.html
About creating my own test and add to that suite, I don't think that Matthew (and the other crew) would like to include a specificly eyecandy-meter as GtkPerf is within a hardware performance tester, I think it's out of context, And I'm not a coder (well, not now), I'm a designer, and I design visual interfaces, so yes, I know what kind of tools I must use for my work, and I sure you that GtkPerf does its job really well. Of course, you must explain what kind of machine you're using for all themes (obviously you can't test in different machines a part of them), you know that enabling Compiz accelerates a lot the averages, gtk-window-decorator is faster than metacity, etc. A lot of questions. Is it relative? I think it's not, because GtkPerf is being used since 2005. I'm not going to talk more about this, I think it's everything clear. Now make your analisis and choice. Regards. PS. I want to apologyze if my words were missunderstood by somebody and my reaction is too emotional about this issue. --
<<attachment: b3.png>>
<<attachment: b2.png>>
<<attachment: b1.png>>
_______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-desktop Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-desktop More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
