I think it would sense for us also, those with > 3.2GB RAM can always add PAE if they so wish.
Regards, Phill. On 17 March 2012 14:13, Julien Lavergne <[email protected]> wrote: > I saw it also, and still thinking about it. My point to keep pae by > default was because nobody else done the same. I didn't want to maintain > this exception only for us, and to give work to people only for this. > > Since Xubuntu switch to non-pae by default, and the change to do it for us > is very small, I am starting to think that we should do the same. Or, I > can't see any point to not switch to non-pae by default. > > Julien Lavergne > > Le 17 mars 2012 à 13:33, Lance <[email protected]> a écrit : > > I posted a couple of links here: > > http://ubuntuforums.org/showpost.php?p=11772755&postcount=1 > > If it's true I wonder if Lubuntu shouldn't do likewise. I personally think > it makes sense since one of our target markets is low resource hardware. > > Maybe someone could ask Colin Watson's opinion? > > -- > Lubuntu-users mailing list > [email protected] > Modify settings or unsubscribe at: > https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/lubuntu-users > > > -- > Lubuntu-users mailing list > [email protected] > Modify settings or unsubscribe at: > https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/lubuntu-users > > -- > <https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/lubuntu-users> > https://wiki.ubuntu.com/phillw > >
-- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-qa Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-qa More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
