And maybe, just maybe, we can get Colin Watson to bear the brunt of the work???????????
I tried to hammer this home here: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/930447/comments/50 So maybe my harping along with a request from the Xubuntu devs got things rolling. I think Colin does know that 90% of my suggestions/requests are at least somewhat sound. Sadly the other 10% are generally insane ;^( Due to visual limitations I've never mastered IRC chat but maybe you could ask Colin, or the installer-team in general, and get an opinion. Lance --- On Sat, 3/17/12, Julien Lavergne <[email protected]> wrote: From: Julien Lavergne <[email protected]> Subject: Re: Xubuntu reverting to non-pae kernel? To: "Lance" <[email protected]> Cc: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>, "[email protected]" <[email protected]> Date: Saturday, March 17, 2012, 9:13 AM I saw it also, and still thinking about it. My point to keep pae by default was because nobody else done the same. I didn't want to maintain this exception only for us, and to give work to people only for this. Since Xubuntu switch to non-pae by default, and the change to do it for us is very small, I am starting to think that we should do the same. Or, I can't see any point to not switch to non-pae by default. Julien Lavergne Le 17 mars 2012 à 13:33, Lance <[email protected]> a écrit : I posted a couple of links here: http://ubuntuforums.org/showpost.php?p=11772755&postcount=1 If it's true I wonder if Lubuntu shouldn't do likewise. I personally think it makes sense since one of our target markets is low resource hardware. Maybe someone could ask Colin Watson's opinion? -- Lubuntu-users mailing list [email protected] Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/lubuntu-users
-- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-qa Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-qa More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
