Hi Lars, cancel that, i found it in my log file. I've now subscribed directly to it[1]
Regards, Phill. 1. https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubiquity/+bug/1041625 On 26 August 2012 10:24, Phill Whiteside <[email protected]> wrote: > For me? > > yeah the bug number! I had a reboot after major update & cannot find it! > The guy from #ubuntu+1 I was chatting to is afk, so I cannot ask him but > others may have a look. > > Thanks, > > Phill. > > > On 26 August 2012 10:10, Lars Noodén <[email protected]> wrote: > >> On 8/26/12 12:07 PM, Phill Whiteside wrote: >> > Hi Lars, >> > >> > can you get the info from /var/log to paste up? along with an lspci from >> > it, and a cat /proc/cpuinfo >> > >> > Please feed the #ubuntu+1 team some crumbs :) They will look into it, >> but >> > really do need something to go on! >> > >> > Thanks, >> > >> > Phill. >> >> Yes, I've gotten syslog, lightdm.log, Xorg.0.log, output from lspci and >> cpuinfo uploaded as attachments to the bug. Anything else? Dave >> Gilbert seemed to think the problem is with X and added that to the >> bug's subject. Certainly X does not start and I cannot even forward X >> apps from the machine via SSH. >> >> Regards, >> /Lars >> >> > On 26 August 2012 09:15, Lars Noodén <[email protected]> wrote: >> > >> >> On 8/25/12 9:16 PM, Phill Whiteside wrote: >> >>> Lars, >> >>> >> >>> #ubuntu+1 have confirmed my initial thoughts, please try to get >> terminal >> >>> session up & ubuntu-bug ubiquity for them >> >> >> >> The apport-* series does not work, giving python errors: >> >> >> >> ERROR: The launchpadlib Python module is not installed. >> >> This functionality is not available. >> >> >> >> Same with ubuntu-bug if I try to associate it with an existing bug >> >> report (#1041625) >> >> >> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubiquity/+bug/1041625 >> >> >> >> I've done the update: >> >> apt-get update && apt-get -y upgrade && apt-get -y dist-upgrade >> >> >> >> Regards, >> >> /Lars >> >> >> >>> (19:06:45) phillw: anyone want more info from the tester? >> >>> (19:07:39) penguin42: phillw: The fontconfig bit is a redherring >> >>> (19:07:59) penguin42: phillw: Everything is moaning about fontconfig >> but >> >>> carrying on; so it's something separate >> >>> (19:08:40) phillw: penguin42: it appears to be stopping the >> installation? >> >>> Lars is a fairly experienced tester, what more do you need? >> >>> (19:08:58) penguin42: phillw: can he get to a text shell at that >> point? >> >>> (19:09:34) phillw: I'll have to email him - he is not IRC person >> >>> (19:09:47) phillw: if he can, what do you need? >> >>> (19:10:06) penguin42: phillw: If he can get to a text shell and bring >> up >> >>> networking then get him to run ubuntu-bug ubiquity and it'll post a >> load >> >> of >> >>> stuff to launchpad >> >>> (19:10:34) ActionParsnip: phillw: did you update ubiquity before >> kicking >> >> it >> >>> off? >> >>> (19:10:34) phillw: penguin42: that is what I suggested to him :) >> >>> (19:10:58) penguin42: phillw: If not it's a little difficult; I'd make >> >> more >> >>> of a guess in terms of X/graphics issues - when he says old, how >> old/what >> >>> spec? >> >>> (19:11:20) phillw: I just wanted to check if i was on the correct >> track >> >> to >> >>> get the data you need. >> >>> (19:13:05) phillw: it is not within the bounds of possibiliiity that >> it >> >> is >> >>> the PAE/ non-PAE kernel etc. But I'd have expected it to complain long >> >>> before that? >> >>> (19:15:57) penguin42: yeh >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> Regards, >> >>> >> >>> Phill. >> >>> On 25 August 2012 18:59, Phill Whiteside <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> >> >>>> Hi Lars, >> >>>> >> >>>> off the top of my head.... issue it to Ubiquity, that is the system >> >> that >> >>>> does the installs. The devs can always re-allocate it later. Does it >> >> try to >> >>>> make a bug report? If not, then I'd suggest using the bug-report >> >> function >> >>>> to get the data off the system. >> >>>> >> >>>> Thanks, >> >>>> >> >>>> Phill. >> >>>> >> >>>> On 25 August 2012 18:39, Lars Noodén <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>>> >> >>>>> I've got an old i386 machine that runs 12.04 fine but with 12.10 >> daily >> >>>>> (several versions) it will not finish booting. After the text >> screen, >> >>>>> it comes up with a screenful of Fontconfig warnings. e.g.: >> >>>>> >> >>>>> Fontconfig warning: "/etc/fonts/conf.d/90-fonts-nanum.conf", >> >>>>> line 40: Having multiple values in <test> isn't supported >> and >> >>>>> may not works as expected. >> >>>>> >> >>>>> I'll have this machine for a few more days at least so I can do a >> >> little >> >>>>> testing with it. What other data would be needed before I file a >> bug >> >>>>> report? >> >>>>> >> >>>>> Regards, >> >>>>> /Lars >> >>>>> >> >>>>> -- >> >>>>> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-qa >> >>>>> Post to : [email protected] >> >>>>> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-qa >> >>>>> More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp >> >>>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> -- >> >>>> https://wiki.ubuntu.com/phillw >> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> > >> > >> >> > > > -- > https://wiki.ubuntu.com/phillw > -- https://wiki.ubuntu.com/phillw
-- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-qa Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-qa More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
