On 26 August 2012 10:30, Phill Whiteside <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Lars, > > cancel that, i found it in my log file. I've now subscribed directly to > it[1] > > Regards, > > Phill. > 1. https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubiquity/+bug/1041625 > > > On 26 August 2012 10:24, Phill Whiteside <[email protected]> wrote: > >> For me? >> >> yeah the bug number! I had a reboot after major update & cannot find it! >> The guy from #ubuntu+1 I was chatting to is afk, so I cannot ask him but >> others may have a look. >> >> Thanks, >> >> Phill. >> >> >> On 26 August 2012 10:10, Lars Noodén <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> On 8/26/12 12:07 PM, Phill Whiteside wrote: >>> > Hi Lars, >>> > >>> > can you get the info from /var/log to paste up? along with an lspci >>> from >>> > it, and a cat /proc/cpuinfo >>> > >>> > Please feed the #ubuntu+1 team some crumbs :) They will look into it, >>> but >>> > really do need something to go on! >>> > >>> > Thanks, >>> > >>> > Phill. >>> >>> Yes, I've gotten syslog, lightdm.log, Xorg.0.log, output from lspci and >>> cpuinfo uploaded as attachments to the bug. Anything else? Dave >>> Gilbert seemed to think the problem is with X and added that to the >>> bug's subject. Certainly X does not start and I cannot even forward X >>> apps from the machine via SSH. >>> >>> Regards, >>> /Lars >>> >>> > On 26 August 2012 09:15, Lars Noodén <[email protected]> wrote: >>> > >>> >> On 8/25/12 9:16 PM, Phill Whiteside wrote: >>> >>> Lars, >>> >>> >>> >>> #ubuntu+1 have confirmed my initial thoughts, please try to get >>> terminal >>> >>> session up & ubuntu-bug ubiquity for them >>> >> >>> >> The apport-* series does not work, giving python errors: >>> >> >>> >> ERROR: The launchpadlib Python module is not installed. >>> >> This functionality is not available. >>> >> >>> >> Same with ubuntu-bug if I try to associate it with an existing bug >>> >> report (#1041625) >>> >> >>> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubiquity/+bug/1041625 >>> >> >>> >> I've done the update: >>> >> apt-get update && apt-get -y upgrade && apt-get -y >>> dist-upgrade >>> >> >>> >> Regards, >>> >> /Lars >>> >> >>> >>> (19:06:45) phillw: anyone want more info from the tester? >>> >>> (19:07:39) penguin42: phillw: The fontconfig bit is a redherring >>> >>> (19:07:59) penguin42: phillw: Everything is moaning about fontconfig >>> but >>> >>> carrying on; so it's something separate >>> >>> (19:08:40) phillw: penguin42: it appears to be stopping the >>> installation? >>> >>> Lars is a fairly experienced tester, what more do you need? >>> >>> (19:08:58) penguin42: phillw: can he get to a text shell at that >>> point? >>> >>> (19:09:34) phillw: I'll have to email him - he is not IRC person >>> >>> (19:09:47) phillw: if he can, what do you need? >>> >>> (19:10:06) penguin42: phillw: If he can get to a text shell and >>> bring up >>> >>> networking then get him to run ubuntu-bug ubiquity and it'll post a >>> load >>> >> of >>> >>> stuff to launchpad >>> >>> (19:10:34) ActionParsnip: phillw: did you update ubiquity before >>> kicking >>> >> it >>> >>> off? >>> >>> (19:10:34) phillw: penguin42: that is what I suggested to him :) >>> >>> (19:10:58) penguin42: phillw: If not it's a little difficult; I'd >>> make >>> >> more >>> >>> of a guess in terms of X/graphics issues - when he says old, how >>> old/what >>> >>> spec? >>> >>> (19:11:20) phillw: I just wanted to check if i was on the correct >>> track >>> >> to >>> >>> get the data you need. >>> >>> (19:13:05) phillw: it is not within the bounds of possibiliiity that >>> it >>> >> is >>> >>> the PAE/ non-PAE kernel etc. But I'd have expected it to complain >>> long >>> >>> before that? >>> >>> (19:15:57) penguin42: yeh >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> Regards, >>> >>> >>> >>> Phill. >>> >>> On 25 August 2012 18:59, Phill Whiteside <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>>> Hi Lars, >>> >>>> >>> >>>> off the top of my head.... issue it to Ubiquity, that is the system >>> >> that >>> >>>> does the installs. The devs can always re-allocate it later. Does it >>> >> try to >>> >>>> make a bug report? If not, then I'd suggest using the bug-report >>> >> function >>> >>>> to get the data off the system. >>> >>>> >>> >>>> Thanks, >>> >>>> >>> >>>> Phill. >>> >>>> >>> >>>> On 25 August 2012 18:39, Lars Noodén <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> >>> >>>>> I've got an old i386 machine that runs 12.04 fine but with 12.10 >>> daily >>> >>>>> (several versions) it will not finish booting. After the text >>> screen, >>> >>>>> it comes up with a screenful of Fontconfig warnings. e.g.: >>> >>>>> >>> >>>>> Fontconfig warning: >>> "/etc/fonts/conf.d/90-fonts-nanum.conf", >>> >>>>> line 40: Having multiple values in <test> isn't supported >>> and >>> >>>>> may not works as expected. >>> >>>>> >>> >>>>> I'll have this machine for a few more days at least so I can do a >>> >> little >>> >>>>> testing with it. What other data would be needed before I file a >>> bug >>> >>>>> report? >>> >>>>> >>> >>>>> Regards, >>> >>>>> /Lars >>> >>>>> >>> >>>>> -- >>> >>>>> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-qa >>> >>>>> Post to : [email protected] >>> >>>>> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-qa >>> >>>>> More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp >>> >>>>> >>> >>>> >>> >>>> >>> >>>> >>> >>>> -- >>> >>>> https://wiki.ubuntu.com/phillw >>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >> >>> >> >>> > >>> > >>> >>> >> >> >> -- >> https://wiki.ubuntu.com/phillw >> > > > > -- > https://wiki.ubuntu.com/phillw >
-- https://wiki.ubuntu.com/phillw
-- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-qa Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-qa More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
