On Thu, 2019-04-25 at 08:08 +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote: > On Wed, 24 Apr 2019 17:21:51 -0700, Walter Lapchynski wrote: > > Base 10 *IS* the standard, according to the IEEE, so I would consider > > it a bug against whomever is using base 2. > > What are physical incorrect values good for? > > It's implausible that making a physical incorrect measuring unit a > standard does avoid confusion, actually it was the original culprit for > confusion. > > As somebody who started Assembly programming on the Breadbox I > vehemently disagree, everybody using base 10 should be shot immediately!
PS: It's paradox to claim that a device is capable of 16 G, 32 G, 64 G, 128 G, 256 G, 512 G, 1024 G etc. if "G" isn't base 2, since those values imply base 2. -- Lubuntu-users mailing list [email protected] Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/lubuntu-users
