Terry, I'm not sure what stripped the attachment (yahoo mail or the list manager), but I've put it here: http://mckinney.co.nz/java/FieldSortedHitQueueJava13.patch
I don't know if there is a patch in bugzilla like this - this is the fix that I first proposed for the java 1.4 stuff, but I never provided a patch, only described it in a post to this list. So, Otis may be referring to a different patch, but if so, it probably uses the same approach to remove the java 1.4 regexp stuff. jamie --- Terry Steichen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Jamie, > > That's a good solution, but alas, there's no > attachment to your post (in my > copy, anyway). Could you either enclose the patch > within your e-mail (so it > doesn't get stripped), and/or point me to the > appropriate Bugzilla (or > whatever) location? > > Much thanks in advance, > > Terry > > PS: I assume this is the same patch that Otis > referred to in response to my > previous message? > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Jamie M" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Lucene Developers List" > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Saturday, March 13, 2004 5:53 AM > Subject: Re: New FieldSortedHitQueue uses Java 1.4 > feature > > > > If you're wanting to test the current cvs version > then > > check the code out from cvs and apply the patch > > attached to this post. > > > > (copy the patch into the directory that you ran > the > > cvs checkout command in, then run: patch < > > FieldSortedHitQueueJava13.patch) > > > > Then compile, and you'll have a lucene 1.4 jar > that > > works on a 1.3 jvm. > > > > jamie > > > > --- Terry Steichen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I wonder if someone could clear up this issue. > I'd > > > like to test the latest > > > CVS version, but it won't compile (because it > can't > > > find > > > java.util.regex.Pattern). If this > regex-dependency > > > is to remain, is there a > > > way that us non-1.4-JVM users could add some > library > > > to get around this > > > problem? Or, is there a plan to remove it, or > at > > > least make it optional? > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > Terry > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > From: "Doug Cutting" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > To: "Lucene Developers List" > > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > Sent: Monday, March 08, 2004 1:33 PM > > > Subject: Re: New FieldSortedHitQueue uses Java > 1.4 > > > feature > > > > > > > > > > Robert Engels wrote: > > > > > Seems like a bad precedent... if developers > have > > > to worry about coding > > > > > around problems in specific JDK's, it could > be a > > > nightmare. What about > > > the > > > > > next user who uses some JDK than is less > > > mainstream? > > > > > > > > I think you're responding to the other branch > of > > > this thread! > > > > > > > > What I was suggesting here is that Tim remove > the > > > regex code from the > > > > Lucene 1.4 codebase, since it requires Java > 1.4, > > > while everything else > > > > in Lucene requires only Java 1.2. > > > > > > > > Separately, there's the issue of how Lucene > should > > > handle a bug in IBM's > > > > 1.3 JIT, but that's not what I was talking > about > > > here. > > > > > > > > Doug > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > > From: Doug Cutting > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > Sent: Monday, March 08, 2004 11:57 AM > > > > > To: Lucene Developers List > > > > > Subject: Re: New FieldSortedHitQueue uses > Java > > > 1.4 feature > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Tim Jones wrote: > > > > > > > > > >>But, if this is the only code depending on > java > > > 1.4, it seems like it > > > > > > > > > > would > > > > > > > > > >>be better to remove it for better version > > > compatibility. Perhaps what > > > > > > > > > > would > > > > > > > > > >>be best would be to have the code detect > which > > > version it's running > > > under > > > > >>and act appropriately. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I vote for just removing it, and keeping > Lucene > > > 1.4 compatible with Java > > > > > 1.2. I don't think it's worth trying to > detect > > > the version. You might > > > > > add a comment, or even a commented-out > 1.4-based > > > implementation, to mark > > > > > this as something to revisit when we > eventually > > > move Lucene to Java 1.4. > > > > > > > > > > Doug > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > __________________________________ > > Do you Yahoo!? > > Yahoo! Mail - More reliable, more storage, less > spam > > http://mail.yahoo.com > > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > ---- > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail - More reliable, more storage, less spam http://mail.yahoo.com --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
