On Saturday 03 April 2004 05:01, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >Does above make sense? > > > >-+ Tatu +- > > No Tatu, I am confused now. You probably need to talk > lower level ... :-) > > Guess you are suggesting something completely different > to Erik's proposal ??
Well, it's bit different approach. Eric answered your direct question, ie. how to do flattened query, I tried to outline doing it without flattening, by structuring indexed data in such a way that you can use prefix or phrase query to do 'real' hierarchic search. I think that mailing list archives have enough good explanations, hopefully more readable than mine... so perhaps search though them first? I'm pretty sure similar question was asked and answered just a month or two ago. If you can not find any, I (or someone else on the list) can try to clarify it further/ Also, I think there was another reply that indicated something was added to Wiki, regarding hierarchic (classification-based) queries. I haven't checked that out, but that might be helpful as well. Hope this helps, -+ Tatu +- --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
