Erik Hatcher wrote:
It would be nice if the Sandbox components were versioned and released along with the core - perhaps this would be a sufficient enough solution? But, alas, I have no free time currently to devote to this effort.

That's precisely the reason to add these to the main CVS tree: if they're somewhere else then they simply won't get versioned and released in parallel with the core, while if they're in the main CVS tree this will happen with no extra effort.


In general, I'm a proponent of bundling as much as possible into a single CVS tree and build procedure, since it makes it much easier to keep things synchronized. If folks feel the jar is too big, then we can always build these into a separate jar. I'd also vote to put analyzers in the same CVS tree and under the top-level build.xml, for the same reason. If we like, we could put them each in subdirectories of src/analyzers, and have each built as a separate jar. Thoughts?

The sandbox should be for experimental stuff. Stuff that's proven widely useful should go into the main tree and get released along with every Lucene release.

Doug

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Reply via email to