> In general, I'm a proponent of bundling as much as possible into a > single CVS tree and build procedure, since it makes it much easier to > > keep things synchronized. If folks feel the jar is too big, then we > can > always build these into a separate jar. I'd also vote to put > analyzers > in the same CVS tree and under the top-level build.xml, for the same > reason. If we like, we could put them each in subdirectories of > src/analyzers, and have each built as a separate jar. Thoughts?
I like this idea. I don't care so much about 1 or more CVS repositories, as much as separate Jars, so if we can make analyzers-1.4.2.jar and highlighter-1.4.2.jar along lucene-1.4.2.jar, that would be ideal, in my opinion. > The sandbox should be for experimental stuff. Stuff that's proven > widely useful should go into the main tree and get released along > with > every Lucene release. True. Otis --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
