I am not a commiter (just an happy user!), but I would suggest the following layout:
asf-repo/ jakarta/ lucene/ trunk/ core/ sandbox/ branches/ tags/
This layout will allow tags and branches of both core and sandbox to be kept in sync without any effort.
Does this make any sense?
Six of one, half dozen of the other. Honestly, I prefer to split the projects out and give them their own trunk/branches/tags directories, just because it seems cleaner to me and additionally because it's the way other projects I've known at the ASF run things. I like to be able to look in the branches and tags directory and know what the tags/branches correspond to immediately, as opposed to this kind of layout where a branch/tag could be just the core, just the sandbox, both, etc. You wouldn't want to always branch/tag both, but sometimes you might, the ambiguity bothers me.
-garrett
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
