Hi,
From: Erik Hatcher [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Any additional comments or objections to this proposal? If I don't hear otherwise, I'll send this to the Jakarta PMC by the end of the day today.
I think that "search.apache.org' is not good name for this project and
Lucene is better.
Will the second edition of your book be titled "Search.Apache.Org in
Action"?-)
Also are your going to rename all namespaces from org.apache.lucene.* to
search.org.apache.*?
Etc..
Lucene is certainly an major player in the initial creation of search.apache.org, however Nutch and other search-related applications, tools, etc would be considered for inclusion there too.
Look at the other new top-level projects - db.apache.org, portals.apache.org, and logging.apache.org. Same idea applies there.
No, we would not change the package names of Lucene. Lucene will still be a sub-project within a top-level project, just as it is under Jakarta now. Jakarta is server-side Java-centric and Lucene has been ported to numerous languages (as you well know!). Perhaps you'd be interested in ASL'ing your implementation and contributing it to the new search.apache.org project :))
Erik
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
