Two questions: 1) Did we have the copyright to move the FAQs at jGuru over to a new one? (I have to ask)
2) How about a new FAQ entry at jGuru: "Where is the official Lucene FAQ?" :) Hen On Fri, 31 Dec 2004 08:02:46 -0500, Erik Hatcher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Dec 31, 2004, at 7:19 AM, Daniel Naber wrote: > > Then basically my whole faq to wiki conversion was wasted time, as > > we'll > > have two FAQs again? That was the reason to move to the wiki: avoid > > useless content duplication. Maybe jGuru should convert its FAQ to a > > real > > forum. > > It wasn't wasted time at all. The "official" FAQ is now the wiki. > > We cannot stop, nor should we try, other forums from hosting Lucene > related content. JavaRanch, jGuru, TheServerSide, etc all have > Lucene-related content. jGuru is a forum _and_ FAQ. A maintainer > (Otis in this case, and myself for the Ant one) at jGuru is responsible > for promoting forum entries to FAQ entries. > > I have mixed feelings about the jGuru situation as it relates to be > personally as a co-maintainer of the Ant area. I would like to see the > quality jGuru system and content more open, but also understand their > situation as a company. > > I strongly suspect that there is very little overlap between the > communities of people that frequent the user list and these other > web-based forums. I personally prefer the e-mail list and the wiki as > _the_ source of Lucene information. Others, however, find that web > forums handy. jGuru's search is quite nice, though finding something > specific on the wiki FAQ shouldn't be difficult either. > > Erik > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
