OK. I see. It can be used in WeakHashTable v3.
DIGY
On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 11:28 AM, Eyal Post <eyalp...@epocalipse.com> wrote:
> void Add(object keyX,object valueX)
> {
> InternalTable.Add( new WeakEntry(keyX), value);
> }
>
> Object Get(object keyX)
> {
> return InternalTable[new WeakEntry(keyX)];
> }
>
>
> WeakEntry.GetHashCode = key.getHashCode;
> WeakEntry.Equals = keyA == keyB
>
> Not sure this is clear enough - I can post full implementation if you'd
> like
> but that'll take me some more time.
>
> Eyal
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Digy [mailto:digyd...@gmail.com]
> > Sent: Sunday, January 11, 2009 23:16 PM
> > To: lucene-net-dev@incubator.apache.org
> > Subject: RE: [jira] Commented: (LUCENENET-106) Lucene.NET
> > (Revision: 603121) is leaking memory
> > Importance: High
> >
> > Hi Eyal,
> >
> > I couldn't find a simple way to use the WeakEntry as a key
> > and then access its value without enumerating all the keys in
> > InternalTable.
> > I think you suggest
> >
> > void Add(object keyX,object valueX)
> > {
> > InternalTable.Add( new WeakEntry(keyX,valueX), value);
> > } // or something like that.
> >
> > Then how do you think that we get the value of "Get(keyX)" ?
> > Enumerating all the keys of InternalTable and comparing the
> > "weakEntry.Key" with "keyX"?
> > When thinking of successive "Add"s, this has the complexity of O(n*n).
> >
> > Can you share your solution?
> >
> > DIGY
> >
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Eyal Post [mailto:eyalp...@epocalipse.com]
> > Sent: Sunday, January 11, 2009 1:08 PM
> > To: lucene-net-dev@incubator.apache.org
> > Subject: RE: [jira] Commented: (LUCENENET-106) Lucene.NET
> > (Revision: 603121) is leaking memory
> >
> > As Luc noted in the first comment to this patch, I think that
> > if this class is to be called WeakHashTable (and therefor
> > imply it is a general purpose weak hash table) then it should
> > be implemented as a real hash table.
> > Therefor, you should not use an array list and make linear
> > comparisons.
> > Instead WeakHashTable should internally use a hashtable. The
> > first implementation was in the right direction, the only fix
> > should have been to use WeakEntry as a key to the table and
> > not the hash code.
> >
> > Eyal
> >
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Digy [mailto:digyd...@gmail.com]
> > > Sent: Friday, January 09, 2009 20:03 PM
> > > To: lucene-net-dev@incubator.apache.org
> > > Subject: RE: [jira] Commented: (LUCENENET-106) Lucene.NET
> > > (Revision: 603121) is leaking memory
> > >
> > > Hi Tim,
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Thanks for the comments. I will correct the 3,4,5.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > 1) Since ArrayList contains WeakEntries & sync.ed for multiple
> > > threads, they can not be null and can not be any other
> > type. I can not
> > > find a bug here. Maybe you can send a more detailed description.
> > >
> > > 2), WeakHashTable is compatible with "HashTable" in .Net world.
> > > "Ht.Add(key,value)" throws an exception for duplicate keys but
> > >
> > > "Ht[key]=value" just adds or replaces.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > DIGY
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Tim Januario (JIRA) [mailto:j...@apache.org]
> > > Sent: Friday, January 09, 2009 7:16 PM
> > > To: lucene-net-dev@incubator.apache.org
> > > Subject: [jira] Commented: (LUCENENET-106) Lucene.NET
> > > (Revision: 603121) is leaking memory
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > [
> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-106?page=com.a
> > tlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&fo
> > cusedCommentId
> > =12662433#action_12662433 ]
> >
> >
> >
> > Tim Januario commented on LUCENENET-106:
> >
> > ----------------------------------------
> >
> >
> >
> > Digy,
> >
> > 1) The WeakHashTable.Exists method creates a possible
> > NullReferenceException because you used WeakEntries[i] As
> > WeakEntry instead of (WeakEntry)WeakEntries[i]. This is only
> > a warning but...
> >
> > 2) The Java WeakHashMap does not throw an execption when
> > put() is called with a key that already exists in the table.
> > It simply replaces the old value with the new value. .NET
> > Hashtable does the same. The Add method of WeakHashTable
> > should remove the WeakEntry if the key is found and replace
> > it with the new value in order to stay in line instead of
> > throwing the Exception.
> >
> > 3) WeakHashTableEnumarator should be WeakHashTableEnumerator
> >
> > 4) WeakEntry.HashCode is not used and should be removed.
> >
> > 5) WeakHashTable.InitialMem is not used and should be removed.
> >
> >
> >
> > Other than that, I think this looks good.
> >
> >
> >
> > -tim
> >
> >
> >
> > > Lucene.NET (Revision: 603121) is leaking memory
> >
> > > -----------------------------------------------
> >
> > >
> >
> > > Key: LUCENENET-106
> >
> > > URL:
> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-106
> >
> > > Project: Lucene.Net
> >
> > > Issue Type: Bug
> >
> > > Environment: .NET 2.0
> >
> > > Reporter: Anton K.
> >
> > > Assignee: Digy
> >
> > > Priority: Critical
> >
> > > Attachments: DIGY-FieldCacheImpl.patch, Digy.rar,
> > > luceneSrc_memUsage.patch, Paches for v2.3.1.rar, WeakHashTable
> > > v2.patch, WeakHashTable+FieldCacheImpl.rar, WeakReferences.rar
> >
> > >
> >
> > >
> >
> > > readerCache Hashtable field (see FieldCacheImpl.cs) never releases
> > > some
> > hash items that have closed IndexReader object as a key. So a
> > lot of Term instances are never released.
> >
> > > Java version of Lucene uses WeakHashMap and therefore doesn't have
> > > this
> > problem.
> >
> > > This bug can be reproduced only when Sort functionality used during
> > search.
> >
> > > See following link for additional information.
> >
> > > http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/java-user/55681
> >
> > > Steps to reproduce:
> >
> > > 1)Create index
> >
> > > 2) Modify index by IndexWiter; Close IndexWriter
> >
> > > 3) Use IndexSearcher for searching with Sort; Close InexSearcher
> >
> > > 4) Go to step 2
> >
> > > You'll get OutOfMemoryException after some time of running
> > this algorithm.
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> >
> > This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
> >
> > -
> >
> > You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
> >
> >
>
>
