[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-366?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12863432#action_12863432
]
Digy commented on LUCENENET-366:
--------------------------------
Hi Ben,
Your patches start to divert from the original Java code(v2.0).
What about porting the new SpellChecker from
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/lucene/java/branches/lucene_2_9/contrib/spellchecker/src/
?
Would you try it?
DIGY
> Spellchecker issues
> -------------------
>
> Key: LUCENENET-366
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-366
> Project: Lucene.Net
> Issue Type: Bug
> Reporter: Ben West
> Priority: Minor
> Attachments: LuceneNet-SpellcheckFixes.patch
>
>
> There are several issues with the spellchecker:
> - It doesn't do duplicate checking across updates (so the same word is often
> indexed many, many times)
> - The n-gram fields are stored as well as indexed, which increases the size
> of the index by several orders of magnitude and provides no benefit
> - Some deprecated functions are used, which slows it down
> - Some methods aren't commented fully
> I will attach a patch that fixes these.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
