[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-366?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12875145#action_12875145
]
Ben West commented on LUCENENET-366:
------------------------------------
Been using your patch for a few days and haven't noticed any problems.
> Spellchecker issues
> -------------------
>
> Key: LUCENENET-366
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-366
> Project: Lucene.Net
> Issue Type: Bug
> Reporter: Ben West
> Priority: Minor
> Attachments: LUCENENET-366-spellcheck29.patch, LUCENENET-366.patch,
> LuceneNet-SpellcheckFixes.patch, spellcheck-2.9-upgrade.patch,
> spellcheck-29.patch
>
>
> There are several issues with the spellchecker:
> - It doesn't do duplicate checking across updates (so the same word is often
> indexed many, many times)
> - The n-gram fields are stored as well as indexed, which increases the size
> of the index by several orders of magnitude and provides no benefit
> - Some deprecated functions are used, which slows it down
> - Some methods aren't commented fully
> I will attach a patch that fixes these.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
