+1, but I'm partial to 0 if the demand is there for it. I don't mind keeping up support for 2.0, in a separate branch, for a set amount of time.
On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 2:01 AM, Moray McConnachie < mmcco...@oxford-analytica.com> wrote: > > >PS: If you are supporting .NET 3.5 then you get .NET 2.0 support > anyway, you just have to bin-deploy the .NET >3.5 dependencies > (System.Core, etc) since they are all the same CLR > > >Aaron Powell > > > Aaron, I think the move to 4.0 is actually to stop supporting 3.5 as > well judging by later emails... > > Moray > ------------------------------------- > Moray McConnachie > Director of IT +44 1865 261 600 > Oxford Analytica http://www.oxan.com > > --------------------------------------------------------- > Disclaimer > > This message and any attachments are confidential and/or privileged. If > this has been sent to you in error, please do not use, retain or disclose > them, and contact the sender as soon as possible. > > Oxford Analytica Ltd > Registered in England: No. 1196703 > 5 Alfred Street, Oxford > United Kingdom, OX1 4EH > --------------------------------------------------------- > >
