+1, burn the ships.
On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 12:43 PM, Christopher Currens <currens.ch...@gmail.com> wrote: > +1, but I'm partial to 0 if the demand is there for it. I don't mind > keeping up support for 2.0, in a separate branch, for a set amount of time. > > On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 2:01 AM, Moray McConnachie < > mmcco...@oxford-analytica.com> wrote: > >> >> >PS: If you are supporting .NET 3.5 then you get .NET 2.0 support >> anyway, you just have to bin-deploy the .NET >3.5 dependencies >> (System.Core, etc) since they are all the same CLR >> >> >Aaron Powell >> >> >> Aaron, I think the move to 4.0 is actually to stop supporting 3.5 as >> well judging by later emails... >> >> Moray >> ------------------------------------- >> Moray McConnachie >> Director of IT +44 1865 261 600 >> Oxford Analytica http://www.oxan.com >> >> --------------------------------------------------------- >> Disclaimer >> >> This message and any attachments are confidential and/or privileged. If >> this has been sent to you in error, please do not use, retain or disclose >> them, and contact the sender as soon as possible. >> >> Oxford Analytica Ltd >> Registered in England: No. 1196703 >> 5 Alfred Street, Oxford >> United Kingdom, OX1 4EH >> --------------------------------------------------------- >> >> >
