Not be a miser, but I'm abstaining till we get a checklist for releases going.
I know that we need to check svn-eof readme use rat - apache license in files (if there is a tutorial on how to use that, I can take that over) docs tickets some form release info (whats in the release) and I'm sure I'm missing stuff. On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 3:53 AM, Troy Howard <thowar...@gmail.com> wrote: > I can't speak for anyone else but I've been inordinately busy since before > the holidays. I'll take a look over the release tomorrow. > > Thanks so much to Prescott and Stephan for keeping things moving along. > > Thanks, > Troy > On Jan 18, 2012 12:33 AM, "Stefan Bodewig" <bode...@apache.org> wrote: > > > Hi Prescott, > > > > First of all, I should have said "thank you". Thank you for putting > > together the release, thank you for dealing with my "formal" > > requirements that some may consider nit-picking and thank you for being > > persistent. > > > > On 2012-01-18, Prescott Nasser wrote: > > > > > What do you mean I wouldn't get three +1s? From the license devs? ( > > > this group seems a bit dead atm) or do you mean from the general? > > > > I meant "this group". A release should be backed by the developers of > > the project and so far I doesn't look that way. Maybe people have just > > waited for me to perform the "legal checks" in order to avoid spending > > time reviewing a release that has to be recalled for non-technical > > reasons, I don't know. > > > > As for general. It sure would be nice if we could get all three mentors > > to vote before informing the general list. By the time you start the > > vote on general, you'll have my +1 and we will get two more of them by > > asking repeatedly, as usual. > > > > Stefan > > >
