LOL... We just wanted to see you grovel a little bit. ;)
On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 4:59 PM, Prescott Nasser <geobmx...@hotmail.com> wrote: > Ha - you guys rock > > Sent from my Windows Phone > ________________________________ > From: Troy Howard > Sent: 1/25/2012 4:37 PM > To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org > Subject: Re: [Lucene.Net] [VOTE] Apache-Lucene-2.9.4g-incubating-RC1 Release > (take 2) > > +1 > > On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 4:25 PM, Digy <digyd...@gmail.com> wrote: >> +1 >> DIGY >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Prescott Nasser [mailto:geobmx...@hotmail.com] >> Sent: Thursday, January 26, 2012 1:56 AM >> To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org >> Cc: lucene-net-...@incubator.apache.org >> Subject: RE: [Lucene.Net] [VOTE] Apache-Lucene-2.9.4g-incubating-RC1 Release >> (take 2) >> >> Thanks for the +1, we need one more vote here, then Stefan will be >> comfortable giving us a plus one, which will give us two plus ones in >> general, and ill only have to beg for one more :) >> >> Sent from my Windows Phone >> ________________________________ >> From: Michael Herndon >> Sent: 1/25/2012 11:15 AM >> To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org >> Cc: lucene-net-...@incubator.apache.org >> Subject: Re: [Lucene.Net] [VOTE] Apache-Lucene-2.9.4g-incubating-RC1 Release >> (take 2) >> >> verified tests pass and checksums match. >> >> so +1 >> >> >> @P, I remember that thread. Those guys stay busy though and devopt >> mentality is different than a devs. >> >> Our needs probably exceed what the svn CMS is meant for due to >> documentation. I am curious if infra allows for or would allow us to throw >> up a static mono/asp.net mvc in the future just so that we could dog food >> the site with search using Lucene.Net and then have it index certain pages >> or sites (wiki, tutorials, static site, docs). We'll probably need to dig >> out our CMS options again and weight against short term and long term >> goals. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 12:31 PM, Prescott Nasser >> <geobmx...@hotmail.com>wrote: >> >>> You know even making a small change to the website like updating the news >>> takes like 30 minutes to run now because of all the files. Its absolutely >>> ridiculous. >>> >>> I got chided by the CMS group, yet when asked how do we put documentation >>> online with the new system there were crickets. >>> >>> >>> >>> Sent from my Windows Phone >>> ________________________________ >>> From: Michael Herndon >>> Sent: 1/25/2012 8:26 AM >>> To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org >>> Cc: lucene-net-...@incubator.apache.org >>> Subject: Re: [Lucene.Net] [VOTE] Apache-Lucene-2.9.4g-incubating-RC1 >>> Release (take 2) >>> >>> I was not able to download the binaries till this morning. The wiki was >>> also having issues. >>> >>> I ran rat on the the released source, that seems fine. did a compare on src >>> zip and the tag. it matches. >>> >>> The only things I saw are nit picks. >>> in the ReadMe the link should point to its respective tag instead of RC3 >>> for just 2_9_4 >>> >>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/lucene.net/tags/Lucene.Net_2_9_4_RC3/lib/should >>> be >>> >>> when releasing the source in the future, we should either include a script >>> that pulls the lib for the developers who want to compile from source >>> inside a tag when the project is built using the solution. Or we should >>> invest into using something like nuget for dependencies so that the >>> dependencies are automatically fetched somehow and we can remove those from >>> svn/scm altogether. >>> >>> the source currently violates the "don't make me think about it" principle. >>> >>> >>> >>> I know we all dislike chms, but until we figure out a better way of posting >>> the generated msdn documentation online, we should include that in releases >>> as well. The static website version generates a high number of static html >>> files and our current CMS requires that those files are pushed into SVN >>> which just is not feasible. Committing that all at once will choke infra's >>> setup (and if they hired ninjas to pay us a visit, I probably wouldn't >>> blame them) and doing partial commits is just borderline insanity. >>> >>> >>> Just waiting on the all the tests to finish running. >>> http://xkcd.com/303/ >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 6:29 AM, Stefan Bodewig <bode...@apache.org> >>> wrote: >>> >>> > On 2012-01-25, Michael Herndon wrote: >>> > >>> > > Stefan what did you use to check the eof of files for svn? >>> > >>> > Pretty much a long and boring manual process. I did something like >>> > >>> > find . -name \*.cs -print0 | xargs -0 -e svn ps svn:eol-style native >>> > >>> > i.e. tried to set the eol-style property on all C# source files. This >>> > won't do anything if the property is set and tell you it has changed >>> > something in "svn status" if it the property hasn't been set before. >>> > >>> > svn will also fail if the file in question contains inconsistent line >>> > ends, this is the case for the NUnit doc files and even some of >>> > Lucene.NET sources. >>> > >>> > Repeat for all other file extension that should map to text files. >>> > >>> > > I'm setting up RAT on my local. Are there any other tools that you or >>> > ASF >>> > > recommends in general to validate releases? >>> > >>> > I think Sebb has a bunch of scripts he uses, but never bothered to look >>> > them up. If so, they'd be inside the comitters svn repo. >>> > >>> > For this release you don't even need to check line-feeds, the properties >>> > have not been set on all files. The patch I provided a while ago only >>> > applied to trunk. To me this is no reason to stop the release, in >>> > particular since most files have Windows line-ends and Prescott built >>> > the release on Windows so the files would be the same with and without >>> > svn:eol-style anyway. >>> > >>> > I intend to provide a new patch for the 3.0.3 branch once you have >>> > decided which way to go. Most likely there'll be files without license >>> > headers in that branch as well. >>> > >>> > Stefan >>> > >>> >> >> ----- >> >> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com >> Version: 2012.0.1901 / Virus Database: 2109/4765 - Release Date: 01/25/12 >>
