Haven't tried the unified patch yet. Tried different solutions before, all were buggy in different ways. My current setup is a bit weird, to say it mildly: I'm using 2.0 for indexing and 2.3.1 for incremental indexing. Although this solution might seem crazy, it is surprisingly stable. So now I'm a bit afraid of trying new patches until 2.3.1 becomes stable [?]
On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 2:31 PM, Jokin Cuadrado <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Have you applied al the pathces that are already disponible? > > You can apply the unified patch that doug sale post to the list 2 weeks > ago. > > > On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 12:27 PM, Pavlo Zahozhenko > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I've got an amazing 10x performance improvement for our small development > > index (a couple of megabytes). However, it fails to index a couple of > > thousands documents on production, so I had to revert to old good 2.0 > > On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 12:18 PM, Floyd Wu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >> I did notice that 2.3.1 get great performance improvement in my > production > >> use. > >> > >> Thanks for Lucene.Net Team's efforts. > >> > >> Floyd > >> > >> 2008/10/29 Michael Mitiaguin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >> > >> > Just wondering did people notice a great time reduction when indexing > >> with > >> > Lucene.Net 2.3.1 Perhaps, someone may provide more detailed statistics > ( > >> > index size , difference ). > >> > > >> > TIA > >> > Michael > >> > > >> > > >
