I didn't really consider "a couple of thousands" as a big index. Also by ( difference , size ) I meant not difference in index size ( 2.1 and 2.3.1 ) , but what would be indexing speed difference ( 2.1 and 2.3.1 ) as index grows, kind of function diff = F( index_size).
1000 docs time_lucene2.1 time_lucene 2.3 100000 docs time_lucene2.1 time_lucene 2.3 1000000 short records from database time_lucene2.1 time_lucene2.3 On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 10:27 PM, Pavlo Zahozhenko < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I've got an amazing 10x performance improvement for our small development > index (a couple of megabytes). However, it fails to index a couple of > thousands documents on production, so I had to revert to old good 2.0 > On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 12:18 PM, Floyd Wu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I did notice that 2.3.1 get great performance improvement in my > production > > use. > > > > Thanks for Lucene.Net Team's efforts. > > > > Floyd > > > > 2008/10/29 Michael Mitiaguin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > Just wondering did people notice a great time reduction when indexing > > with > > > Lucene.Net 2.3.1 Perhaps, someone may provide more detailed statistics > ( > > > index size , difference ). > > > > > > TIA > > > Michael > > > > > >
