"Me too!" :-0 I hope the committers try and leverage us to accelerate the releases. Pls. suggest ways we can help and contribute.
On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 5:40 PM, Matt Honeycutt<[email protected]> wrote: > I'd love to help out, too, I'm just not sure how to get started. > > On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 4:33 PM, Wagner Ignacio Pinto Junior < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> >> I think you are right. >> >> >> >> Maybe the guys need some help, more contributors or committers. >> >> >> >> I managed to port some code from the Java Lucene, the Brazillian analyser, >> to C#. >> >> >> >> I'm new to Lucene.Net but I'm willing to help. >> >> >> >> Regards, >> >> Wagner >> >> > Date: Thu, 2 Jul 2009 12:39:33 +1000 >> > Subject: Re: Is Lucene Release 2.3.1 happening in near future ? >> > From: [email protected] >> > To: [email protected] >> > >> > I know , it is working fine, but my concern was : >> > >> > 1. Seeing formal recent release brings some comfort to people who never >> used >> > it before and in process of making decision to use or not to use >> Lucene.Net >> > 2. Unless a release happens, Lucene.Net will be kept in incubation state >> > which again gives a wrong impression about maturity of this Lucene port. >> > >> > >> > On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 4:01 AM, Wagner Ignacio Pinto Junior < >> > [email protected]> wrote: >> > >> > > >> > > I'm developing a solution using Lucene 2.3.1 from svn trunk, and Its >> > > working fine >> > > >> > > > Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2009 12:45:42 +1000 >> > > > Subject: Is Lucene Release 2.3.1 happening in near future ? >> > > > From: [email protected] >> > > > To: [email protected] >> > > > >> > > > The questions like that seemed to be asked before and the answer >> seemed >> > > to >> > > > be to check-out code from SVN and that it is quite stable. Will we >> see >> > > one >> > > > day 2.3.1 release in >> > > > >> > > > http://incubator.apache.org/lucene.net/download/ >> > > > >> > > > as the only release there 2.0.0.4 last modified April 24 2007. >> > > > >> > > > What prevents it from happening - failing tests or something else ? >> > > >> >
