Li, U can store HTML on disk and lucene can index that. But to think
that a db makes a website cumbersome, for all but the most basic
sites, unless you're doing some radical thinking, you're digging
yourself into a hole.
Do you have some more detail about the site you're trying to build and
the implementation you're thinking about using?
-----------------------------
e-wayne <at> isit.gd
t-07525 424 882
On 11 Aug 2009, at 06:03 AM, Li Bing <[email protected]> wrote:
Thanks so much for your responses!
Originally my system use MySQL to save some non-full-text searching
data and use Lucene to manage my crawled Web pages. However, I think
MySQL makes my system cumbersome. So I decide to manage all of my data
by Lucene no matter if the data is full-text searching based or not.
According to your emails, I think the above approach is feasible,
right? Thanks again!
Best,
LB
On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 3:27 AM, Michael
Barbarelli<[email protected]> wrote:
Sorry if my last message was terse , Li. The beauty of Lucene is
that
you can basically index from almost any data source imaginable. You
will just have to do the work of parsing through that data yourself.
On Monday, August 10, 2009, Li Bing <[email protected]> wrote:
Hi, all,
Is it possible to use Lucene.NET only without DB? What about the
performance?
I appreciate so much for your help!
LBLabs
