Dear Wayne, I might not clarify what I am doing.
I didn't establish a traditional Web site. What I am doing is a searching engine with some new techniques. I need to crawl pages from some Web sites and manage them on my site. I think when users search the pages, Lucene can support for sure. However, when I manage the crawled links locally myself, a database, such as MySQL, must be good enough. This is my initial design. But if so, my site must have two modules to manage data. One is Lucene and the other is MySQL. Is it necessary? I even found that MySQL had a bug, such as "Invalid attempt to access a field before calling Read()". So if Lucene can do both the above work, I might not use MySQL any more. How do you think about that? Thanks so much! LB On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 1:14 PM, Wayne Douglas<[email protected]> wrote: > Li, U can store HTML on disk and lucene can index that. But to think that a > db makes a website cumbersome, for all but the most basic sites, unless > you're doing some radical thinking, you're digging yourself into a hole. > > Do you have some more detail about the site you're trying to build and the > implementation you're thinking about using? > > ----------------------------- > e-wayne <at> isit.gd > t-07525 424 882 > > On 11 Aug 2009, at 06:03 AM, Li Bing <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Thanks so much for your responses! >> >> Originally my system use MySQL to save some non-full-text searching >> data and use Lucene to manage my crawled Web pages. However, I think >> MySQL makes my system cumbersome. So I decide to manage all of my data >> by Lucene no matter if the data is full-text searching based or not. >> >> According to your emails, I think the above approach is feasible, >> right? Thanks again! >> >> Best, >> LB >> >> On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 3:27 AM, Michael >> Barbarelli<[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> Sorry if my last message was terse , Li. The beauty of Lucene is that >>> you can basically index from almost any data source imaginable. You >>> will just have to do the work of parsing through that data yourself. >>> >>> On Monday, August 10, 2009, Li Bing <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>> Hi, all, >>>> >>>> Is it possible to use Lucene.NET only without DB? What about the >>>> performance? >>>> >>>> I appreciate so much for your help! >>>> >>>> LBLabs >>>> >>> >
