On Mon, 23 Dec 2002, Armbrust, Daniel C. wrote: > >IMHO it is a bug and the > >point why Lucene does not scale well on huge collections of documents. I > >am talking about my previous tests when I used live index and concurrent > >query+insert+delete (I wanted to simulate real application). > > [snip] > > What is your definition of huge? I have yet to have a problem, and I am
TREC-3 and above, or >20GB of real (i.e. HTML) docs. > B. I know the impact on search times of adding more documents you know it for optimal case, because your inverted lists may have identical length. It implies the linearity between space and query time. BTW: My note was not against you or your tests. My note was for better JAVA engine(s). :) -g- -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
