If I use an untokenized field, would "fox" match this as well? I need to support both exact match searches and searches where one word exists in the field.
-----Original Message----- From: Doug Cutting [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, October 22, 2003 9:44 AM To: Lucene Users List Subject: Re: Exact Match Wilton, Reece wrote: > Does Lucene support exact matching on a tokenized field? > > So for example... if I add these three phrases to the index: > - "The quick brown fox" > - "The quick brown fox jumped" > - "brown fox" > > I want to be able to do an exact field match so when I search for "brown > fox" I only get the last one returned. I can do this in my own code by > storing the data and then comparing it to the search phrase. Is that > the best way of doing this? Why not just use an untokenized field? Then just use a TermQuery, searching for the term "brown fox". Doug --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
