<grin> Yes we have got one or two parsers floating around somewhere or other ;)
Unfortunately, I'm unlikely to be able to tap into these before next version of the product I'm working on (can't say too much because of the nda etc), and so for now I'm having to make do with a basic text search. I'll give the whitespace analyzer a try and see if I get any better results. Thanks, Iain ***************************************** * Micro Focus Developer Forum 2004 * * 3 days that will make a difference * * www.microfocus.com/devforum * ***************************************** -----Original Message----- From: Erik Hatcher [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 16 December 2003 12:31 To: Lucene Users List Subject: Re: Disabling modifiers? On Tuesday, December 16, 2003, at 07:28 AM, Erik Hatcher wrote: > And yes, if you are using StandardTokenizer, you are probably not > tokenizing COBOL quite like you expect. Is there a COBOL parser you > could tap into that could give you the tokens you want? Ummm..... nevermind that last question... I just realized where you work! :) So, my recommendation would be to tap into some parser for the COBOL language that you have handy and have it feed your Analyzer appropriately. Or, use something very very simple like the WhitespaceAnalyzer as a first try. Erik --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ________________________________________________________________________ This e-mail has been scanned for viruses by MCI's Internet Managed Scanning Services - powered by MessageLabs. For further information visit http://www.mci.com ________________________________________________________________________ --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
