Not yet. For the compound file format, when the files get bigger, if I add few new files frequently, the bigger files has to be updated. Will that affect lot on the search and produce heavier disk I/O compared with the traditional index format? It seems OS cache makes quite difference when the files not changed differently.
Regards, Hui -----Original Message----- From: Erik Hatcher [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, March 03, 2004 9:21 PM To: Lucene Users List Subject: Re: Sys properties Was: java.io.tmpdir as lock dir .... once again On Mar 3, 2004, at 4:25 PM, hui wrote: > Anoterh similar issue. If we could have a parameter to control the max > number of the files within the index, that is going to avoid the > problem of > running of the file handler issue. > When the file number within one index reaches the limit, optimization > is > going to be called. > Right now, if the file number within one index out of the limit of your > window system, you lost the index. > Thank you for the consideration. Have you tried using the compound file format introduced in 1.3? --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
