I will refactor again using Set with no copying this time (except for the String[] and Hashtable) constructors. This was my original preference, but I got caught up in the arguments by Kevin and lost my ideals temporarily :)
I expect to do this later tonight or tomorrow.
How about this as a compromise...
No copy on constructor... use a Set but in the documentation summarize this conversation and point out that the user should use a HashSet and NOT any other type of set and that it will result in a copy..
I think Doug's comment about a potentially faster impl in the future was a good point...
Kevin
--
Please reply using PGP.
http://peerfear.org/pubkey.asc NewsMonster - http://www.newsmonster.org/
Kevin A. Burton, Location - San Francisco, CA, Cell - 415.595.9965
AIM/YIM - sfburtonator, Web - http://peerfear.org/
GPG fingerprint: 5FB2 F3E2 760E 70A8 6174 D393 E84D 8D04 99F1 4412
IRC - freenode.net #infoanarchy | #p2p-hackers | #newsmonster
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
