currently rank is indexed as Field.Keyword("rank_field", somerank);all ranks will be 0-100 .... so i format them as 0### to make lucene sort them correctly. For my testing purposes, I confine the range to 0-10.. so all ranks are indexed and retreived as 000-010 respectively. if i create a sort with the sortfield array of score,rank gives me the identical results to only sorting on score. BUT a sort of rank only does sort by rank. -Chris On Thu, 14 Oct 2004 16:49:12 -0400, Erik Hatcher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Oct 14, 2004, at 4:40 PM, Chris Fraschetti wrote: > > If I print the different hit score for each doc, they are the same.. > > but the secondary sorting still does not take affect. is it possible > > that even though the float returned to me and i print out, internally > > has even more precision and they are indeed not the same? I'm getting > > ready to edit the lucene source and recompile.. but I just wanted to > > make sure that this is indeed my problem. > > How did you index your rank field? That has bearing on how sorting > works. What are the values of the rank field like? Numeric? > > Erik > > > > > > > -Chris > > > > > > On Thu, 14 Oct 2004 12:42:37 -0400, Richard Alpert > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Oh, yeah, of course. I'm sorry, I wasn't reading thoroughly enough. > >> > >> Richard > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: Chris Fraschetti [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> Sent: Thursday, October 14, 2004 12:42 PM > >> To: Richard Alpert > >> Subject: Re: sorting and score ordering > >> > >> Richard, thank you, but i would need the score to be changed inside > >> lucene in order for the sort to work properly... my earlier questions > >> was in regards to rounding the score internally in order to allow for > >> a secondary sort to take hold when similar results... say to a precion > >> of 0.## occur. > >> > >> Thanks, > >> Chris > >> > >> On Thu, 14 Oct 2004 12:36:15 -0400, Richard Alpert > >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>> Chris, what about something like > >>> > >>> score1 = ((float)(int(score*100+0.5)))/100.00 > >>> > >>> 'score1' will equal 'score' rounded to the nearest 0.01. > >>> > >>> Richard > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> -----Original Message----- > >>> From: Chris Fraschetti [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>> Sent: Thursday, October 14, 2004 12:14 PM > >>> To: Lucene Users List > >>> Subject: Re: sorting and score ordering > >>> > >>> Is there a way to generalize the score that lucene is comparing ? > >>> I.e. > >>> round it off to say a precision of 0.## ? In order to make this sort > >>> work better with 'duplicate' values? (by my terms... hits that have > >>> scores within within a certain distance of eachother.) > >>> > >>> -Chris > >>> > >>> On Thu, 14 Oct 2004 11:27:34 -0400, Erik Hatcher > >>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>>> On Oct 13, 2004, at 5:40 PM, Chris Fraschetti wrote: > >>>>> and finally if i do.... > >>>>> > >>>>> SortField score_sort = ScoreField.FIELD_SCORE; > >>>>> SortField rank_sort = new SortField(RANK_FIELD, true); > >>>>> SortField[] sort_fields = {score_sort, rank_sort}; > >>>>> Sort sort = new Sort(sort_fields); > >>>>> hits = searcher.search(query, sort); > >>>>> > >>>>> I get the same results as I did with the score_sort only... no > >>>>> change > >>>>> in the ordering of the rank is there... any ideas? It looks to me > >>>>> as > >>>>> if it's completely ignoring it. > >>>> > >>>> This is sorting first by score and then by your rank field. The > >>>> rank > >>>> field sort only applies when the scores are the same. I suspect > >>>> you're > >>>> getting different scores so you'd never see rank come into play. > >>>> > >>>> Display the score and rank in your results to see for sure. > >>>> > >>>> Erik > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> -------------------------------------------------------------------- > >>>> - > >>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>>> > >>>> > >>> > >>> -- > >>> ___________________________________________________ > >>> Chris Fraschetti, Student CompSci System Admin > >>> University of San Francisco > >>> e [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://meteora.cs.usfca.edu > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- > >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>> > >>> > >> > >> -- > >> ___________________________________________________ > >> Chris Fraschetti, Student CompSci System Admin > >> University of San Francisco > >> e [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://meteora.cs.usfca.edu > >> > > > > > > -- > > ___________________________________________________ > > Chris Fraschetti, Student CompSci System Admin > > University of San Francisco > > e [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://meteora.cs.usfca.edu > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- ___________________________________________________ Chris Fraschetti, Student CompSci System Admin University of San Francisco e [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://meteora.cs.usfca.edu --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
