I would have to add my vote to keeping focus. We use Lucene with Tomcat, 
but we like it particularly because it has no dependencies and will work 
on anything else just as well. This makes it very versatile and easy to 
incorporate into projects. Some dependencies would be ok (like a RegEx 
package for example), but if it starts getting "integrated" with other 
projects in ways that don't maintain a clean separation it will become 
more and more problematic to use Lucene.
Of course (I love Open Source! :) ) we can always rip out the parts that 
we don't need, but it's much easier when they aren't there in the first 
place. Also makes for a more stable product with less bugs.

But in the end, I'm not sure that this is a vote against getting with 
Jakarta - don't know much about the "in" culture there.
Also, Jakarta project is growing rapidly. Pretty soon its exclusivity 
might be diluted, and it might become just another SourceForge, do you 
think?

> From: "Tal Dayan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
>         "Lucene-Users@Lists. Sourceforge. Net" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: RE: [Lucene-users] RE: [Lucene-dev] Jakarta benefits
> Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2001 19:34:12 -0700
> 
> If so, the committers of Lucene will have to be on guard to keep the focus
> of the project.
> 
> Tal
> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Mike
>> Cannon-Brookes
>> Sent: Tuesday, June 05, 2001 12:00 AM
>> To: Lucene-Users@Lists. Sourceforge. Net
>> Subject: [Lucene-users] RE: [Lucene-dev] Jakarta benefits
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Might I just mention a disadvantage I see?
>> 
>> Jakarta software tends to work very well with Jakarta software - but there
>> is very little incentive to make the modules work apart from each
>> other (for
>> example Struts should be 4 modules IMHO, Taglibs should be broken out into
>> different modules).
>> 
>> Something to be wary of. I'm all for Lucene working with Jakarta, but the
>> best thing about it at the moment is that it works with other
>> stuff too (and
>> has zero features which need to be 'turned off').
>> 
>> -mike
>> 
>> _________________________________________
> 


_______________________________________________
Lucene-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lucene-users

Reply via email to