On Jul 5, 2011, at 10:29 PM, Chris Hostetter wrote: > > : and thought through by a discussion from the team. However, these > subtleties of > : whether it's 0.1.1 v 0.2.0 are probably best left to the RM. > > Well, sure you could name it Lucy v# 6.6.6 ... hell if it wasn't for CPAN > you could name it Lucy v# X9$ ... i'm pretty sure we were all discussing > it from a "what branch to release off of" standpoint, using the version > numbers to refer to the branches.
Gotcha. I'm +1 then for yours and Joe's suggestion for 0.2.0 based off of latest trunk. The 0.1 feature branch has been great and yes, backporting stuff there allowed folks to keep testing while dev occurs on trunk. Let's do 0.2.0. Cheers, Chris ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Chris Mattmann, Ph.D. Senior Computer Scientist NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA Office: 171-266B, Mailstop: 171-246 Email: [email protected] WWW: http://sunset.usc.edu/~mattmann/ ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Adjunct Assistant Professor, Computer Science Department University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
