+1. All tests pass on FreeBSD 9-BETA (Perl 5.12.4).
----- Original Message ----- > From: Marvin Humphrey <[email protected]> > To: [email protected] > Cc: > Sent: Saturday, August 6, 2011 3:00 PM > Subject: Re: [lucy-dev] [VOTE] Apache Lucy (incubating) 0.2.0 RC 3 > > On Sun, Jul 24, 2011 at 07:02:11PM -0700, Marvin Humphrey wrote: >> I'm hoping that if we gently remind our Mentors, we will get the needed >> votes during this phase; if we don't, we'll have to recruit > freelancer votes >> from other Incubator PMC members on general@incubator. > > The vote tally stands at four +1 votes from Lucy PPMC members, including two > Incubator PMC +1 votes (from Chris Mattmann and myself). We need one more +1 > from a member of the Incubator PMC. > > Hoss, Upayavira, Joe... can one of you please review the release artifacts? > (VOTE thread start at <http://markmail.org/message/7gyiojuxein2tfid>). > > There's an inquiry over on the lucy-user list from someone who wants to > develop on Linux and deploy on Windows. Lucy 0.1.0 won't suffice for that, > because of all the Windows build bugs -- but 0.2.0 should work fine. I would > like to be able to answer "You should use Lucy 0.2.0" without > reservation. > > It would also be nice to close this downstream bug regarding compilation > failure under Strawberry Perl 5.10.1: > <https://rt.cpan.org/Public/Bug/Display.html?id=69442>. > > The portability fixes in 0.2.0 may not affect anyone in the Lucy development > community directly, but we clearly have users waiting on them. > > Marvin Humphrey >
