Sent from my iPhone
On Oct 27, 2011, at 6:28 PM, "Torsten Curdt" <[email protected]> wrote: >>> That's all and great but this falls down as soon as Marvin (for >>> whatever reason) would be gone. >> >> I wholly disagree with you. > > Right. So then there would be just no one committing? > Please explain how that should work from your POV. Committing isn't the only contribution. > >>> Frankly - I don't understand the rush. >> >> What rush? I raised this issue months ago, and we actually had some >> discussions >> about it. Most folks in the community agreed that the remaining item to >> check off >> was the licensing issues. > > Unfortunately in terms of diversity not that much seems to have changed since. > >> http://s.apache.org/a08 > > ...even with the new committer on board. Says you. You were trolling then and you are again. > >> Months is not a rush. > > You are pushing for it - and I don't get why. > You probably don't. Every mentor should be asking the question periodically if their podlings are ready to graduate. >> Go read the Lucy reports: the project has been in Incubation >> since July 2010: so it's been about 1 year, 3 months. Every project has a >> different >> amount of time in Incubation > > Exactly. So let's give it the time it needs. What's so bad if it takes 3 > years? That's not a sustainable model for the incubator. > Just bringing this up every other month does not bring it any closer > to a successful graduation. Try 3 months. > >> and every project has a checklist of things to get done >> before graduating. I think we've met that checklist. > > Quoting from the incubator guide at > Snip... > That's just not the case yet. Says you with absolutely 0 merit in this community besides lurking. Sorry but we can agree to disagree and leave it at that. >
