On Fri, Nov 04, 2011 at 03:09:42PM +0200, goran kent wrote: > However, wrap everything together and call them all from a single > search machine (ie, to collect results and display), the performance > drops to the sum total of all the remote machine's time. In other > words, if each search node in the cluster takes .3s to complete (in > parallel), then the total time is 10 (or 20, or 30, depending on how > many machines in the cluster) X .3 = 3s, or 6s, or 9s, etc.
Sounds like the nodes are being accessed serially rather than in parallel. I'll look into it. Marvin Humphrey
