On Fri, Nov 4, 2011 at 3:31 PM, Marvin Humphrey <[email protected]> wrote: > On Fri, Nov 04, 2011 at 03:09:42PM +0200, goran kent wrote: >> However, wrap everything together and call them all from a single >> search machine (ie, to collect results and display), the performance >> drops to the sum total of all the remote machine's time. In other >> words, if each search node in the cluster takes .3s to complete (in >> parallel), then the total time is 10 (or 20, or 30, depending on how >> many machines in the cluster) X .3 = 3s, or 6s, or 9s, etc. > > Sounds like the nodes are being accessed serially rather than in parallel. > I'll look into it.
oh, please god let it be so. else I'm gonna go climb the trees.
