Hey Mike,

> Message: 6
> Date: Mon, 3 Mar 2008 15:23:28 +0300
> From: "Mike Barnard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: [LUG]
> To: "Linux Users Group Uganda" <[email protected]>
> Message-ID:
>        <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>
> Hi Mark
>
> On Mon, Mar 3, 2008 at 10:42 AM, Mark Wamai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >
> > Been a while since I last flashed a D-Link but i'd noticed that the
> Newer
> > WRT
> > models especially after WRT-54G had less memory and so couldn't be
> > flashed.
> >
>
> not so true my friend. Even with CISCO's attempt to stop folks from
> flushing
> their firmware, the DDWRT  guys came up with a micro version of their
> firmware that can install very easily.


Hmmnn.. Just when Cisco thought it was finally safe..


> Before they released that Micro
> version, there was a more crude method of doing it. Open the Linksys
> machine, short pin 15 of the memory chip with the earthing and as soon as
> it
> starts booting, run a fimware upgrade tool from linksys, only that point
> the
> DDWRT firmware to it instead.
>

Had all this amo but cdn't deploy at that time hence my earlier "couldn't be
 flashed".... Just picture Badru walking in on you trying to short
his new out-of-the-box router... :-)


>
> > You might register better results with older models if you can pick up
> > one..
> >
>
> The one problem that the new linksys hardware has is over heating when
> flushed with DDWRT. but that can be worked out. one more problem that many
> people have complained about is an apparent hanging of the linksys which
> requires an HUP. This is not the case as well as this symptom manifests
> mainly with users running Windows Vista, Windows XP SP-3, and a few
> Windows
> XP SP-2. any one else does not seem to experience this.
>
>
> >
>
>
> --
> Mike
>
> Of course, you might discount this possibility, but remember that one in
> a million chances happen 99% of the time.
> ------------------------------------------------------------
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL:
> http://orion.kym.net/pipermail/lug/attachments/20080303/e4f9d0fe/attachment.html
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 7
> Date: Mon, 3 Mar 2008 15:36:14 +0300
> From: "Mike Barnard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: [LUG] Re: minimum hardware limits
> To: "Linux Users Group Uganda" <[email protected]>
> Message-ID:
>        <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>
> On Mon, Mar 3, 2008 at 12:04 PM, joachim Gwoke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
> > ok then,
> > back to linux and related. I have always wondered just what are the real
> > or practical lower hardware requirements for using Linux? its RAM needs
> seem
> > to be increasing, are pentium ones still in use and for what,
> considering
> > the kernel's growth in complexity. what is the recommended hardware
> > requirements today for Ugandans considering the early pentiums are still
> > very much around?
> >
>
> It depends on a few things. What is your Linux system running, GUI (this
> has
> become heavier with each release), mail server, web server.... depending
> on
> what you are doing, your Linux system my  demand more and more and more.
> But
> if you were to run bare-bones-minimum, nothing much has changed.
>
>
>
> --
> Mike
>
> Of course, you might discount this possibility, but remember that one in
> a million chances happen 99% of the time.
> ------------------------------------------------------------
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL:
> http://orion.kym.net/pipermail/lug/attachments/20080303/b409a4a9/attachment.html
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 8
> Date: Mon, 03 Mar 2008 14:35:49 +0200
> From: Hari Kurup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: [LUG] Re: minimum hardware limits
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: [email protected]
> Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
>
> Mark Tinka wrote:
> > On Monday 03 March 2008, Hari Kurup wrote:
> >
> >> Unless Kiggs changed it recently, the box that runs this
> >> very mailing list is an old IBM Pentium II with 256MB of
> >> RAM.
> >
> > What Linux release version?
>
> IIRC, SuSE 8.2 or thereabouts.
>
> --
> Hari
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> LUG mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://kym.net/mailman/listinfo/lug
>
>
> End of LUG Digest, Vol 43, Issue 7
> **********************************
>



-- 
God didn't promise days without pain, laughter without sorrow, sun without
rain, but He did promise
strength for the day, comfort for the tears, and light for the way.
_______________________________________________
LUG mailing list
[email protected]
http://kym.net/mailman/listinfo/lug
%LUG is generously hosted by INFOCOM http://www.infocom.co.ug/

The above comments and data are owned by whoever posted them (including 
attachments if any). The List's Host is not responsible for them in any way.
---------------------------------------

Reply via email to