besides the last feature, www.proxmox.com does the same thing (look for the free version). Nice web-interface, failover, live backups (if you use KVM) and its based on openvz, so it performs really really well.
Love it. -- rgds, Reinier Battenberg Director Mountbatten Ltd. +256 782 801 749 www.mountbatten.net On Tuesday 26 January 2010 17:39:23 sanga collins wrote: > I too recommend Vmware, i use it extensively in my data center and at > remote sites. The ability to move the guest to different hardware without > more than the investment in time copying the vm files is a big plus. Also > ESXi4 from vmware is free as well. This version does not require the base > OS such as ubuntu or centos so some of the overhead is reduced. I often > begin building a server on my vista box, then once testing is complete > upload it to VMware or ESXi server at our datacenter. ... makes life easy > :) > > On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 4:14 AM, Simon Peter Muwanga <[email protected]>wrote: > > Dear LUG Community, > > > > Am using ubuntu 9.04 . Whats the most reliable virtualization tool that > > suites ubuntu 9.04? I have come across KVM, Virtual Box and VMware. > > > > Simon. > > > > _______________________________________________ > > LUG mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://kym.net/mailman/listinfo/lug > > %LUG is generously hosted by INFOCOM http://www.infocom.co.ug/ > > > > The above comments and data are owned by whoever posted them (including > > attachments if any). The List's Host is not responsible for them in any > > way. --------------------------------------- > _______________________________________________ LUG mailing list [email protected] http://kym.net/mailman/listinfo/lug %LUG is generously hosted by INFOCOM http://www.infocom.co.ug/ The above comments and data are owned by whoever posted them (including attachments if any). The List's Host is not responsible for them in any way. ---------------------------------------
