On Thursday 11 February 2010 02:17:10 am Noah Sematimba wrote: > You should have heard the uproar at IETF74 when there was > a BOF on v6NAT people were almost fighting!!
Well, that's what we get for overlooking this issue during the early design stages of the v6 protocol. Cheers, Mark.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ LUG mailing list [email protected] http://kym.net/mailman/listinfo/lug %LUG is generously hosted by INFOCOM http://www.infocom.co.ug/ The above comments and data are owned by whoever posted them (including attachments if any). The List's Host is not responsible for them in any way. ---------------------------------------
