On Jul 23, 2010, at 11:38 AM, Brian Ssennoga wrote:
Stephen,
That sure would be a plus - I, we and us, should actually come out
to document instances that are simply wise NOT TO Migrate - if any.
I must add, that my current assignment may not be as accommodative,
but i totally agree -
so LUG - is there a case of Migration that falls in Stephen's
categorization below? Please share....comprehensively and
conclusively!
Actually the most used argument against migration is usually the
support issue. There is no one company that one can pay support to and
be sure that when you need a patch or fix, they are going to produce
it unlike proprietary software. This is usually a big issue for large
corporates.
Noah.
_______________________________________________
LUG mailing list
[email protected]
http://kym.net/mailman/listinfo/lug
LUG is generously hosted by INFOCOM http://www.infocom.co.ug/
All Archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
The above comments and data are owned by whoever posted them (including
attachments if any). The List's Host is not responsible for them in any way.
---------------------------------------
