On Tuesday, July 27, 2010 02:01:47 am Reinier Battenberg 
wrote:

> One was if i could not get into trouble and the other one
> is 'what if you cant route your traffic through the uixp
> anymore'
> 
> Well, sorry, i think its a cool idea. I would test it out
> if i got the full picture on my own little DNS server.
> 
> But with pessimists like this, we're not getting
> anywhere.

Reinier, perhaps I should dispense with the succinctness and 
be more explicit.

The issue isn't about being "pessimistic" or "cool". You are 
not an operator that provides services to paying customers. 
So with all due respect, I may not really expect you to get 
it.

As an operator, where customers are using my network to get 
to the world, and to important resources such as Google, I 
cannot afford to implement a strategy that would effectively 
create a situation where I can no longer, potentially, serve 
my them, without a clear way to mitigate or backout of such 
a situation, should it arise.

If I'm a research network, and my users know that I'm always 
on the bleeding edge, and cannot guarantee them any level of 
service stability, yes, I will tinker as much as I can as 
that's the best use of my shillings. But paying customers on 
a commercial service help run my network, pay my staff's 
salaries and keep us all in business. The decisions I make 
about how I run my network need to keep their interests in 
mind, at all times.

If I'm going to do something like this, I would do it 
properly, because all my cool points will fly out the window 
the moment customers can't reach Google, and I'm unable to 
fix that in less than 10 seconds.

My question to you, and anyone else that thinks this is a 
neat trick, was very simple: what is your fall-back plan? 
Anybody that has run a network knows that this is a critical 
part of implementing a new feature.

Mark.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

_______________________________________________
LUG mailing list
[email protected]
http://kym.net/mailman/listinfo/lug

LUG is generously hosted by INFOCOM http://www.infocom.co.ug/

All Archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/

The above comments and data are owned by whoever posted them (including 
attachments if any). The List's Host is not responsible for them in any way.
---------------------------------------

Reply via email to