On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 11:51 AM, Reinier Battenberg
<[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> From my SEACOM connection i cant ping either. Here are 2 traceroutes
>
> Now here is the fun part: there is a machine in both traceroutes that is 
> exactly the same. But on TEAMS, traffic passes that machine, and on SEACOM it 
> blocks it. That does not smell like a DNS issue to me

Yea, that's obviously not DNS.  Could your IP address have been
blacklisted somehow?  Below is from a machine on Infocom:

PING 209.88.90.14 (209.88.90.14) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from 209.88.90.14: icmp_seq=1 ttl=45 time=1455 ms
64 bytes from 209.88.90.14: icmp_seq=2 ttl=45 time=1026 ms


traceroute to 209.88.90.14 (209.88.90.14), 30 hops max, 60 byte packets
 1  192.168.5.1 (192.168.5.1)  1.345 ms  1.802 ms  2.226 ms
 2  192.168.9.1 (192.168.9.1)  74.764 ms  94.861 ms  109.856 ms
 3  41.222.0.1 (41.222.0.1)  129.390 ms  144.462 ms  164.333 ms
 4  bb-rtr-cont.imul.com (41.222.0.10)  179.782 ms  200.166 ms  214.766 ms
 5  * * *
 6  sr-12.10G.london.kdn.co.ke (41.191.225.214)  299.395 ms  269.876
ms  307.350 ms
 7  * * *
 8  ge5-3-0-1000M.ar2.LON3.gblx.net (208.50.13.193)  312.356 ms
317.748 ms  318.027 ms
 9  208.178.62.198 (208.178.62.198)  318.364 ms  318.595 ms  318.819 ms
10  207-226-47-222.static.pccwglobal.net (207.226.47.222)  458.971 ms
458.650 ms  459.183 ms
11  * * *
12  62.56.129.105.satcom-systems.net (62.56.129.105)  870.325 ms
865.555 ms  860.406 ms
13  194.133.122.161 (194.133.122.161)  879.141 ms  884.215 ms  893.841 ms
14  cr1hre.telone.co.zw (194.133.122.45)  893.292 ms  888.309 ms  888.317 ms
15  * gta-cust-end.comone.co.zw (209.88.88.82)  1399.209 ms  1054.091 ms
16  * * *
17  * * *
18  * * *
19  * * *
20  * * *
21  * * *
22  * * *
23  * * *
24  * * *
25  * * *
26  * * *
27  * * *
28  * * *
29  * * *
30  * * *






>
> 207-226-47-222.static.pccwglobal.net (207.226.47.222)
>
> (btw, Zimbabwe is in Africa, right? So why is traffic to zim going via londen 
> & paris?)
>
> Over TEAMS (where the ping works)
>
> r...@devispconf:~# traceroute 209.88.90.14
>
> traceroute to 209.88.90.14 (209.88.90.14), 30 hops max, 40 byte packets
>
> 1 physic1.mountbatten.net (41.191.79.226) 0.051 ms 0.009 ms 0.008 ms
>
> 2 rh-teams-rtr.roketelkom.co.ug (41.191.76.1) 0.825 ms 0.824 ms 0.810 ms
>
> 3 41.202.230.33 (41.202.230.33) 1.756 ms 1.992 ms 2.224 ms
>
> 4 41.202.226.45 (41.202.226.45) 1.210 ms 1.214 ms 1.200 ms
>
> 5 41.202.226.1 (41.202.226.1) 1.190 ms 1.181 ms 1.170 ms
>
> 6 po6-2.passe2.Paris.opentransit.net (193.251.251.197) 172.275 ms 172.059 ms 
> 172.049 ms
>
> 7 te11-3.passe1.Paris.opentransit.net (193.251.128.73) 172.037 ms 172.779 ms 
> 172.772 ms
>
> 8 tengige0-7-0-2.pastr1.Paris.opentransit.net (193.251.240.149) 173.722 ms 
> 173.718 ms 173.704 ms
>
> 9 te1-3.parse1.Paris.opentransit.net (193.251.128.162) 172.693 ms 172.693 ms 
> 172.578 ms
>
> 10 peerpccw.GW.opentransit.net (193.251.252.14) 172.998 ms 173.015 ms 173.002 
> ms
>
> 11 207-226-47-222.static.pccwglobal.net (207.226.47.222) 251.903 ms 252.780 
> ms 253.256 ms
>
> 12 * * 207-226-47-241.static.pccwglobal.net (207.226.47.241) 263.044 ms
>
> 13 62.56.129.105.satcom-systems.net (62.56.129.105) 788.482 ms 788.469 ms 
> 788.442 ms
>
> 14 194.133.122.161 (194.133.122.161) 788.689 ms 787.420 ms 787.897 ms
>
> 15 cr1hre.telone.co.zw (194.133.122.45) 786.653 ms 787.371 ms 786.606 ms
>
> 16 gta-cust-end.comone.co.zw (209.88.88.82) 887.533 ms 864.531 ms *
>
> 17 * * *
>
> 18 * * *
>
> 19 * * *
>
> 20 * * *
>
> 21 * * *
>
> 22 * * *
>
> 23 * * *
>
> 24 * * *
>
> 25 * * *
>
> 26 * * *
>
> 27 * * *
>
> 28 * * *
>
> 29 * * *
>
> 30 * * *
>
> rein...@mountlab6:/var/www$ traceroute 209.88.90.14
>
> traceroute to 209.88.90.14 (209.88.90.14), 30 hops max, 60 byte packets
>
> 1 ipcop.mountbatten.net (192.168.38.1) 0.232 ms 0.176 ms 0.226 ms
>
> 2 41.220.13.21 (41.220.13.21) 1.800 ms 3.218 ms 3.162 ms
>
> 3 41.220.12.129 (41.220.12.129) 16.685 ms 16.692 ms 16.640 ms
>
> 4 192.168.12.1 (192.168.12.1) 40.007 ms 43.628 ms 43.576 ms
>
> 5 192.168.145.1 (192.168.145.1) 43.527 ms 43.469 ms 43.419 ms
>
> 6 41.220.12.41 (41.220.12.41) 43.377 ms 41.875 ms 41.812 ms
>
> 7 41.220.12.49 (41.220.12.49) 41.781 ms 26.165 ms 26.116 ms
>
> 8 if-ctu-edge-ci.data.co.ug (41.220.12.33) 26.073 ms 78.825 ms 78.773 ms
>
> 9 41.221.81.117 (41.221.81.117) 78.729 ms 78.703 ms 81.710 ms
>
> 10 static-41-222-1-5.metronet.imul.com (41.222.1.5) 81.781 ms 81.744 ms 
> 81.695 ms
>
> 11 * * *
>
> 12 sr-12.10G.london.kdn.co.ke (41.191.225.214) 304.210 ms 304.220 ms 252.114 
> ms
>
> 13 * * *
>
> 14 ge5-3-0-1000M.ar2.LON3.gblx.net (208.50.13.193) 326.909 ms 369.585 ms 
> 369.543 ms
>
> 15 208.178.62.198 (208.178.62.198) 708.593 ms 708.518 ms 708.476 ms
>
> 16 207-226-47-222.static.pccwglobal.net (207.226.47.222) 708.227 ms 708.255 
> ms 708.201 ms
>
> 17 * * *
>
> 18 * * *
>
> 19 * * *
>
> 20 * * *
>
> 21 * * *
>
> 22 * * *
>
> 23 * * *
>
> 24 * * *
>
> 25 * * *
>
> 26 * * *
>
> 27 * * *
>
> 28 * * *
>
> 29 * * *
>
> 30 * * *
>
> --
>
> rgds,
>
> Reinier Battenberg
>
> Director
>
> Mountbatten Ltd.
>
> +256 758 801 749
>
> www.mountbatten.net
>
> On Monday 10 January 2011 11:37:38 McTim wrote:
>
> > <top post apology>
>
> >
>
> > Hi David,
>
> >
>
> > Your DNS analysis is spot on.
>
> >
>
> > I still can't ping the host tho:
>
> >
>
> > 209.88.90.8
>
> >
>
> > C:\Documents and Settings\Administrator>ping 209.88.90.8
>
> >
>
> > Pinging 209.88.90.8 with 32 bytes of data:
>
> >
>
> > Request timed out.
>
> > Request timed out.
>
> > Request timed out.
>
> > Request timed out.
>
> >
>
> > Ping statistics for 209.88.90.8:
>
> > Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 0, Lost = 4 (100% loss),
>
> >
>
> > So that host is offline. I can ping .14 now:
>
> >
>
> > C:\Documents and Settings\Administrator>ping 209.88.90.14
>
> >
>
> > Pinging 209.88.90.14 with 32 bytes of data:
>
> >
>
> > Reply from 209.88.90.14: bytes=32 time=1043ms TTL=46
>
> > Reply from 209.88.90.14: bytes=32 time=920ms TTL=46
>
> > Reply from 209.88.90.14: bytes=32 time=1169ms TTL=46
>
> > Reply from 209.88.90.14: bytes=32 time=1113ms TTL=46
>
> >
>
> > Ping statistics for 209.88.90.14:
>
> > Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
>
> > Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
>
> > Minimum = 920ms, Maximum = 1169ms, Average = 1061ms
>
> >
>
> > > This just looks like a DNS issue to me.
>
> > > There are four DNS servers for the domain www.gta.gov.zw:
>
> > > ns1.gta.gov.zw
>
> > > ns1.telone.co.zw
>
> > > ns2.telone.co.zw
>
> > > ns.gta.gov.zw
>
> > > ns1.gta.gov.zw and ns1.telone.co.zw have a record for www.gta.gov.zw
>
> > > which has a CNAME pointing to web.gta.gov.zw.
>
> > > ns2.telone.co.zw and ns.gta.gov.zw have a record for www.gta.gov.zw which
>
> > > has a CNAME pointing to mailpri2.gta.gov.zw.
>
> > > Doing a DNS lookup of web.gta.gov.zw fails, so when you try to do a DNS
>
> > > lookup on www.gta.gov.zw when the DNS info
>
> > > has propagated from ns1.gta.gov.zw or ns1.telone.co.zw it will not be
>
> > > able to get past the lookup for web.gta.gov.zw.
>
> > > Interestingly enough, ns1.gta.gov.zw and ns1.telone.co.zw do both have an
>
> > > A record for web.gta.gov.zw of 209.88.90.8 whereas ns2.telone.co.zw
>
> > > and ns.gta.gov.zw don't have any record for web.gta.gov.zw.
>
> > > If I add "209.88.90.8  www.gta.gov.zw" to my /etc/hosts file (just to
>
> > > make sure my http headers request the correct virtual server) and try to
>
> > > open www.gta.gov.zw in a browser I get a nasty SQL error message
>
> > > (although now it's timing out).
>
> > > ns1.gta.gov.zw, ns2.telone.co.zw, ns.gta.gov.zw all agree
>
> > > that mailpri2.gta.gov.zw is 209.88.90.14 however ns1.telone.co.zw doesn't
>
> > > have a record for it.  If I add "209.88.90.14    www.gta.gov.zw" to my
>
> > > /etc/hosts file the correct web site (compared to the google cache) does
>
> > > indeed open fine.  So if you really need to access that site, just add
>
> > > that to your hosts file until the people handling the DNS records there
>
> > > clean up their mess.  My guess is that a machine went down, and the site
>
> > > was hastily transfered to another machine (their mail server) but the
>
> > > DNS changes weren't done thoroughly and the records were left in a very
>
> > > inconsistent state.
>
> > > David
>
> > >
>
> > >
>
> > >
>
> > > On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 9:43 AM, Reinier Battenberg
>
> > >
>
> > > <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > >> Hi,
>
> > >>
>
> > >> This is all for sake of curiousity, and for the greater local hosting
>
> > >> (on an african level) good.
>
> > >>
>
> > >> By all means, go play golf :-)
>
> > >>
>
> > >> --
>
> > >>
>
> > >> rgds,
>
> > >>
>
> > >> Reinier Battenberg
>
> > >>
>
> > >> Director
>
> > >>
>
> > >> Mountbatten Ltd.
>
> > >>
>
> > >> +256 758 801 749
>
> > >>
>
> > >> www.mountbatten.net
>
> > >>
>
> > >> On Monday 10 January 2011 09:06:39 McTim wrote:
>
> > >> > Reiner,
>
> > >> >
>
> > >> >
>
> > >> >
>
> > >> > is this idle curiosity or business critical? If the latter, i can
>
> > >> >
>
> > >> > spend some time on it, but if the former, then I'd rather not today!
>
> > >> >
>
> > >> >
>
> > >> >
>
> > >> > On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 8:32 AM, Reinier Battenberg
>
> > >> >
>
> > >> > <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > >> > > the .14 also works over TEAMS. The problem is with the whole subnet,
>
> > >> > > on
>
> > >> > >
>
> > >> > > SEACOM i can not even resolve names (like mctim, are you on the same
>
> > >> > >
>
> > >> > > upstream?)
>
> > >> >
>
> > >> > the upstream of my provider is TATA.
>
> > >> >
>
> > >> >
>
> > >> >
>
> > >> > because 209.88.90.14 is the DNS server for this domain, too.
>
> > >> >
>
> > >> >
>
> > >> >
>
> > >> >
>
> > >> >
>
> > >> > there is no reverse DNS for this subnet. That is one issue:
>
> > >> >
>
> > >> >
>
> > >> >
>
> > >> > C:\Documents and Settings\Administrator>dig @ns.gta.gov.zw.
>
> > >> >
>
> > >> > 90.88.209.in-addr.ar pa
>
> > >> >
>
> > >> >
>
> > >> >
>
> > >> > ; <<>> DiG 9.3.2 <<>> @ns.gta.gov.zw. 90.88.209.in-addr.arpa
>
> > >> >
>
> > >> > ; (1 server found)
>
> > >> >
>
> > >> > ;; global options: printcmd
>
> > >> >
>
> > >> > ;; Got answer:
>
> > >> >
>
> > >> > ;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 742
>
> > >> >
>
> > >> > ;; flags: qr aa rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 0, AUTHORITY: 1, ADDITIONAL:
>
> > >> > 0
>
> > >> >
>
> > >> >
>
> > >> >
>
> > >> > ;; QUESTION SECTION:
>
> > >> >
>
> > >> > ;90.88.209.in-addr.arpa. IN A
>
> > >> >
>
> > >> >
>
> > >> >
>
> > >> > ;; AUTHORITY SECTION:
>
> > >> >
>
> > >> > 90.88.209.in-addr.arpa. 86400 IN SOA gta.gov.zw.
>
> > >> >
>
> > >> > webmaster.gta.gov.zw . 2006101301 28800 14400 3600000 86400
>
> > >> >
>
> > >> >
>
> > >> >
>
> > >> > ;; Query time: 1078 msec
>
> > >> >
>
> > >> > ;; SERVER: 209.88.90.3#53(209.88.90.3)
>
> > >> >
>
> > >> > ;; WHEN: Mon Jan 10 08:51:00 2011
>
> > >> >
>
> > >> > ;; MSG SIZE rcvd: 96
>
> > >> >
>
> > >> > > r...@devispconf:~# ping 209.88.90.14
>
> > >> > >
>
> > >> > >
>
> > >> > >
>
> > >> > > PING 209.88.90.14 (209.88.90.14) 56(84) bytes of data.
>
> > >> > >
>
> > >> > >
>
> > >> > >
>
> > >> > > 64 bytes from MailScanner warning: numerical links are often
>
> > >> > > malicious: 209.88.90.14: icmp_seq=1 ttl=45 time=789 ms
>
> > >> > >
>
> > >> > >
>
> > >> > >
>
> > >> > > 64 bytes from MailScanner warning: numerical links are often
>
> > >> > > malicious: 209.88.90.14: icmp_seq=2 ttl=45 time=788 ms
>
> > >> > >
>
> > >> > >
>
> > >> > >
>
> > >> > > --- 209.88.90.14 ping statistics ---
>
> > >> >
>
> > >> > I get SFA when I ping that IP:
>
> > >> >
>
> > >> >
>
> > >> >
>
> > >> > C:\Documents and Settings\Administrator>ping 209.88.90.14
>
> > >> >
>
> > >> >
>
> > >> >
>
> > >> > Pinging 209.88.90.14 with 32 bytes of data:
>
> > >> >
>
> > >> >
>
> > >> >
>
> > >> > Request timed out.
>
> > >> >
>
> > >> > Request timed out.
>
> > >> >
>
> > >> > Request timed out.
>
> > >> >
>
> > >> > Request timed out.
>
> > >> >
>
> > >> >
>
> > >> >
>
> > >> > Ping statistics for MailScanner warning: numerical links are often
>
> > >> > malicious: 209.88.90.14:
>
> > >> >
>
> > >> > Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 0, Lost = 4 (100% loss),
>
> > >> >
>
> > >> > but as you can see, I can not resolve the IP from the hostname:
>
> > >> > >ping gta.gov.zw
>
> > >> >
>
> > >> > Ping request could not find host gta.gov.zw. Please check the name and
>
> > >> > try
>
> > >> >
>
> > >> > again
>
> > >> >
>
> > >> >
>
> > >> >
>
> > >> > so it is a DNS issue, as well, perhaps as a connectivity issue.
>
> > >> >
>
> > >> >
>
> > >> >
>
> > >> > I cannot, unlike Hari, use 8.8.8.8 to get an answer from dig:
>
> > >> >
>
> > >> >
>
> > >> >
>
> > >> > C:\Documents and Settings\Administrator>dig @MailScanner warning:
>
> > >> > numerical links are often malicious: 8.8.8.8 gta.gov.zw
>
> > >> >
>
> > >> >
>
> > >> >
>
> > >> > ; <<>> DiG 9.3.2 <<>> @MailScanner warning: numerical links are often
>
> > >> > malicious: 8.8.8.8 gta.gov.zw
>
> > >> >
>
> > >> > ; (1 server found)
>
> > >> >
>
> > >> > ;; global options: printcmd
>
> > >> >
>
> > >> > ;; Got answer:
>
> > >> >
>
> > >> > ;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 635
>
> > >> >
>
> > >> > ;; flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 0, AUTHORITY: 1, ADDITIONAL: 0
>
> > >> >
>
> > >> >
>
> > >> >
>
> > >> > ;; QUESTION SECTION:
>
> > >> >
>
> > >> > ;gta.gov.zw. IN A
>
> > >> >
>
> > >> >
>
> > >> >
>
> > >> > ;; AUTHORITY SECTION:
>
> > >> >
>
> > >> > gta.gov.zw. 1800 IN SOA ns.gta.gov.zw.
>
> > >> >
>
> > >> > webmaster.gta.gov .zw. 2010072000 28800 14400 360000 86400
>
> > >> >
>
> > >> >
>
> > >> >
>
> > >> > ;; Query time: 1046 msec
>
> > >> >
>
> > >> > ;; SERVER: 8.8.8.8#53(8.8.8.8)
>
> > >> >
>
> > >> > ;; WHEN: Mon Jan 10 08:44:10 2011
>
> > >> >
>
> > >> > ;; MSG SIZE rcvd: 77
>
> > >> >
>
> > >> >
>
> > >> >
>
> > >> >
>
> > >> >
>
> > >> > Nor can I get an answer from the ns that has the SOA:
>
> > >> >
>
> > >> >
>
> > >> >
>
> > >> > C:\Documents and Settings\Administrator>dig @ns.gta.gov.zw. gta.gov.zw
>
> > >> >
>
> > >> >
>
> > >> >
>
> > >> > ; <<>> DiG 9.3.2 <<>> @ns.gta.gov.zw. gta.gov.zw
>
> > >> >
>
> > >> > ; (1 server found)
>
> > >> >
>
> > >> > ;; global options: printcmd
>
> > >> >
>
> > >> > ;; Got answer:
>
> > >> >
>
> > >> > ;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 346
>
> > >> >
>
> > >> > ;; flags: qr aa rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 0, AUTHORITY: 1, ADDITIONAL:
>
> > >> > 0
>
> > >> >
>
> > >> >
>
> > >> >
>
> > >> > ;; QUESTION SECTION:
>
> > >> >
>
> > >> > ;gta.gov.zw. IN A
>
> > >> >
>
> > >> >
>
> > >> >
>
> > >> > ;; AUTHORITY SECTION:
>
> > >> >
>
> > >> > gta.gov.zw. 86400 IN SOA ns.gta.gov.zw.
>
> > >> >
>
> > >> > webmaster.gta.gov .zw. 2010110900 28800 14400 360000 86400
>
> > >> >
>
> > >> >
>
> > >> >
>
> > >> > ;; Query time: 906 msec
>
> > >> >
>
> > >> > ;; SERVER: 209.88.90.3#53(209.88.90.3)
>
> > >> >
>
> > >> > ;; WHEN: Mon Jan 10 08:44:43 2011
>
> > >> >
>
> > >> > ;; MSG SIZE rcvd: 77
>
> > >> >
>
> > >> > > 3 packets transmitted, 2 received, 33% packet loss, time 2004ms
>
> > >> > >
>
> > >> > >
>
> > >> > >
>
> > >> > > rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 788.927/789.188/789.450/0.926 ms
>
> > >> > >
>
> > >> > >
>
> > >> > >
>
> > >> > > r...@devispconf:~# telnet 209.88.90.14 80
>
> > >> > >
>
> > >> > >
>
> > >> > >
>
> > >> > > Trying 209.88.90.14...
>
> > >> > >
>
> > >> > >
>
> > >> > >
>
> > >> > > Connected to 209.88.90.14.
>
> > >> >
>
> > >> > So you CAN connect (for some value of that word) to that address?
>
> > >> >
>
> > >> > > Escape character is '^]'.
>
> > >> > >
>
> > >> > >
>
> > >> > >
>
> > >> > > ^]
>
> > >> > >
>
> > >> > >
>
> > >> > >
>
> > >> > > telnet>
>
> > >> > >
>
> > >> > >
>
> > >> > >
>
> > >> > > So, with my ISP and SEACOM
>
> > >> >
>
> > >> > It looks like SEACOM isn't at all involved in the L3 issues on this
>
> > >> > one.
>
> > >> >
>
> > >> >
>
> > >> >
>
> > >> >
>
> > >> >
>
> > >> > not being helpful, who di I contact?
>
> > >> >
>
> > >> >
>
> > >> >
>
> > >> > [email protected], that is in the dig result.
>
> > >> >
>
> > >> >
>
> > >> >
>
> > >> > and from robtex:
>
> > >> >
>
> > >> >
>
> > >> >
>
> > >> > contact information for gta.gov.zw
>
> > >> >
>
> > >> > [email protected] (responsible for gta.gov.zw)
>
> > >> >
>
> > >> > [email protected] (responsible for gip.net)
>
> > >> >
>
> > >> > [email protected] (responsible for telone.co.zw)
>
> > >> >
>
> > >> > [email protected] (responsible for co.zw)
>
> > >> >
>
> > >> >
>
> > >> >
>
> > >> >
>
> > >> >
>
> > >> > telone is their upstream AFAICS.
>
> > >>
>
> > >> --
>
> > >> This message has been scanned for viruses and
>
> > >> dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
>
> > >> believed to be clean.
>
> > >> _______________________________________________
>
> > >> The Uganda Linux User Group: http://linux.or.ug
>
> > >>
>
> > >> Send messages to this mailing list by addressing e-mails to:
>
> > >> [email protected]
>
> > >> Mailing list archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
>
> > >> Mailing list settings: http://kym.net/mailman/listinfo/lug
>
> > >> To unsubscribe: http://kym.net/mailman/options/lug
>
> > >>
>
> > >> The Uganda LUG mailing list is generously hosted by INFOCOM:
>
> > >> http://www.infocom.co.ug/
>
> > >>
>
> > >> The above comments and data are owned by whoever posted them (including
>
> > >> attachments if any). The mailing list host is not responsible for them
>
> > >> in any way.
>
> > >
>
> > > --
>
> > > This message has been scanned for viruses and
>
> > > dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
>
> > > believed to be clean.
>
> > > _______________________________________________
>
> > > The Uganda Linux User Group: http://linux.or.ug
>
> > >
>
> > > Send messages to this mailing list by addressing e-mails to:
>
> > > [email protected] Mailing list archives:
>
> > > http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ Mailing list settings:
>
> > > http://kym.net/mailman/listinfo/lug
>
> > > To unsubscribe: http://kym.net/mailman/options/lug
>
> > >
>
> > > The Uganda LUG mailing list is generously hosted by INFOCOM:
>
> > > http://www.infocom.co.ug/
>
> > >
>
> > > The above comments and data are owned by whoever posted them (including
>
> > > attachments if any). The mailing list host is not responsible for them in
>
> > > any way.
>
> >
>
> > _______________________________________________
>
> > The Uganda Linux User Group: http://linux.or.ug
>
> >
>
> > Send messages to this mailing list by addressing e-mails to:
>
> > [email protected] Mailing list archives:
>
> > http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ Mailing list settings:
>
> > http://kym.net/mailman/listinfo/lug
>
> > To unsubscribe: http://kym.net/mailman/options/lug
>
> >
>
> > The Uganda LUG mailing list is generously hosted by INFOCOM:
>
> > http://www.infocom.co.ug/
>
> >
>
> > The above comments and data are owned by whoever posted them (including
>
> > attachments if any). The mailing list host is not responsible for them in
>
> > any way.
>
> --
> This message has been scanned for viruses and
> dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
> believed to be clean.
> _______________________________________________
> The Uganda Linux User Group: http://linux.or.ug
>
> Send messages to this mailing list by addressing e-mails to: [email protected]
> Mailing list archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
> Mailing list settings: http://kym.net/mailman/listinfo/lug
> To unsubscribe: http://kym.net/mailman/options/lug
>
> The Uganda LUG mailing list is generously hosted by INFOCOM: 
> http://www.infocom.co.ug/
>
> The above comments and data are owned by whoever posted them (including 
> attachments if any). The mailing list host is not responsible for them in any 
> way.
_______________________________________________
The Uganda Linux User Group: http://linux.or.ug

Send messages to this mailing list by addressing e-mails to: [email protected]
Mailing list archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
Mailing list settings: http://kym.net/mailman/listinfo/lug
To unsubscribe: http://kym.net/mailman/options/lug

The Uganda LUG mailing list is generously hosted by INFOCOM: 
http://www.infocom.co.ug/

The above comments and data are owned by whoever posted them (including 
attachments if any). The mailing list host is not responsible for them in any 
way.

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.

Reply via email to