I think I'm really being misunderstood here. Like i pointed out before, the article is about "How to improve YOUR (MY) programming skills". not about, software specifications or users requirements or how bad or good open source stuff is.
We should realize computer programming and automatic computation dates way before software engineering or whatever of its conceptual idiosyncrasies. Thus its presence is a different consequence/ calling and not users needs. Like most user comments emphasized, however, the article is not about production but rather learning/ education. So if i may ask; When you customized that Drupal or open atrium to the users requirements did you distribute the solution as an open source improvement? I'm missing the point here. Most distributed software should be abstracted and can't meet all user specifics. However, if it is flawed, then it needs to fixed and redistributed as an upgrade, fix or whatever May be one question you need to ask is: What is implied by improved or even Good programming skills.
_______________________________________________ The Uganda Linux User Group: http://linux.or.ug Send messages to this mailing list by addressing e-mails to: [email protected] Mailing list archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ Mailing list settings: http://kym.net/mailman/listinfo/lug To unsubscribe: http://kym.net/mailman/options/lug The Uganda LUG mailing list is generously hosted by INFOCOM: http://www.infocom.co.ug/ The above comments and data are owned by whoever posted them (including attachments if any). The mailing list host is not responsible for them in any way.
