Yes. We are interested. I have not been able to track the bug since it
was created. I have also contacted mjmac earlier regarding this. Let me
know if you could create a new account or correct the permission for me
to view the bug entry.
Weikuan
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Please don't reply to lustre-devel. Instead, comment in Bugzilla by using the
following link:
https://bugzilla.lustre.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11089
Created an attachment (id=9151)
Please don't reply to lustre-devel. Instead, comment in Bugzilla by using the
following link:
--> (https://bugzilla.lustre.org/attachment.cgi?id=9151&action=view)
add per-export nid and uuid proc entries
This patch adds "nid" and "uuid" entries to the per-export proc directories, so
that users can at least determine what the nid is.
Nobody from ORNL seems to be subscribed to this bug - mjmac, do you know if
they
are still interested?
If we can get someone to say the additional "nid" file within the per-export
dir
is acceptable, I'll go ahead and backport this to b1_4.
_______________________________________________
Lustre-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.clusterfs.com/mailman/listinfo/lustre-devel
_______________________________________________
Lustre-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.clusterfs.com/mailman/listinfo/lustre-devel
