Please don't reply to lustre-devel. Instead, comment in Bugzilla by using the following link: https://bugzilla.lustre.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11089
(In reply to comment #4) > Created an attachment (id=9151) Please don't reply to lustre-devel. Instead, comment in Bugzilla by using the following link: --> (https://bugzilla.lustre.org/attachment.cgi?id=9151&action=view) > add per-export nid and uuid proc entries > > This patch adds "nid" and "uuid" entries to the per-export proc directories, > so > > that users can at least determine what the nid is. > > Nobody from ORNL seems to be subscribed to this bug - mjmac, do you know if > they > are still interested? > If we can get someone to say the additional "nid" file within the per-export > dir > is acceptable, I'll go ahead and backport this to b1_4. > Some comments I have after going through the history of this bug entry. -- Agree to organize per client stat struct's in an OBD-neutral way -- There is a need to zero brw in function, init_brw_stats -- There is a bug in create/delete. Our fix is different. Not sure if CFS fix as posted in Comment #4 is based on the patch posted in Comment? -- Fixes for the above two are posted as patch #id=9169. Overall: We need to sync on our efforts. Our fixes have been tested and running on an 80-node linux system for about 2 months. It would be great if we could converge these into a final patch for cray machines at ORNL. _______________________________________________ Lustre-devel mailing list [email protected] https://mail.clusterfs.com/mailman/listinfo/lustre-devel
