Please don't reply to lustre-devel. Instead, comment in Bugzilla by using the 
following link:
https://bugzilla.lustre.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11463



(In reply to comment #11)
> (From update of bug11463">attachment 9366)
> I have no problem with the technical parts of this patch, but I have some
> concern that this will cause Lustre to violate POSIX requirements for the
> behaviour of chmod.
> SUSv2 says for chmod(2):

I am not sure why is this relevant. This is chmod, and we modify chown 
behaviour.
And If we do not change group or user, no point in dropping suid/sgid, I wou;d
presume and we violate nothing.

_______________________________________________
Lustre-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.clusterfs.com/mailman/listinfo/lustre-devel

Reply via email to